Review the following research questions.
- Is the use of soap and water or alcohol-based rubs more effective in preventing nosocomial infections?
- How effective are anti-depressive medications on anxiety and depression?
- For patients of 70 years and older, how effective is the use of the influenza vaccine at preventing flu as compared to patients who have not received the vaccine?
- What is the relationship between alcohol and breast cancer?
- What is the difference between self-efficacy scores in older adults who exercise and the scores of those who do not?
- What is the difference in attitudes of male and female college students toward condoms?
Next, select 3 of the above questions and address the following:
- Identify an appropriate research design.
- Discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the design.
- Provide a rationale for the design you selected
SU library link
Expert Solution Preview
Introduction:
Research questions are an important aspect of medical research, and selecting an appropriate research design is crucial in addressing these questions. In this task, we will review and evaluate several research questions and propose appropriate research designs that can be used to answer them. We will also discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the selected design and provide a rationale for our choices.
1. Is the use of soap and water or alcohol-based rubs more effective in preventing nosocomial infections?
Research Design: Randomized controlled trial (RCT)
Strengths: RCTs are considered the gold standard in medical research as they help to minimize confounding variables and biases. A well-designed RCT can provide reliable evidence on the efficacy of interventions.
Weaknesses: RCTs can be expensive, time-consuming, and may not always be feasible in certain situations. Ethical issues may arise in some RCTs, especially when patients are subjected to a placebo or receive suboptimal treatment.
Rationale: An RCT is an appropriate research design for this question as it allows for the direct comparison of soap and water versus alcohol-based rubs in preventing nosocomial infections. Participant allocation could be randomized to prevent selection bias, and blinding could be used to minimize performance bias.
2. How effective are anti-depressive medications on anxiety and depression?
Research Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis
Strengths: Systematic reviews and meta-analyses are useful in summarizing evidence from multiple studies. They can provide robust evidence on the effectiveness of interventions, especially when individual studies have conflicting results.
Weaknesses: Publication bias and heterogeneity among studies can affect the validity of the results. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses are also highly dependent on the quality of the included studies.
Rationale: A systematic review and meta-analysis would be appropriate for this question as it would allow for the examination of multiple studies on the effectiveness of anti-depressive medications on anxiety and depression. This design would provide a comprehensive understanding of the current evidence base.
3. What is the relationship between alcohol and breast cancer?
Research Design: Cohort study
Strengths: Cohort studies are useful in examining the relationship between exposures and outcomes. They can provide information on the temporal relationship between exposure and outcome and allow for the study of multiple outcomes.
Weaknesses: Cohort studies can be expensive, especially for long-term follow-up. Confounding variables can also affect the validity of the results.
Rationale: A cohort study would be appropriate for this question as it would allow for the examination of the relationship between alcohol consumption and breast cancer over time. Participants could be recruited based on their alcohol consumption levels, and the outcome (breast cancer) could be assessed over several years. This design would allow for the examination of the temporal relationship between exposure and outcome.