Select one current, qualitative or mixed methods scholarly nursing article related to your PICOT question and determine its strengths, limitations, and potential application.
PICOT question: In elderly patients with diabetes what is the effect of complementary and alternative therapy in comparison to lifestyle management and pharmacological treatment on blood sugar levels to be completed over three months.
Complete the Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence Based Practice Appendix E Evidence Appraisal Tool (file attached). Once you’ve completed the tool, use your own words to summarize your appraisal of the article. Include the following:
- Description of the purpose
- Explanation of research design
- Discussion of sample
- Description of data collection methods
- Summary of findings
- Strengths of the study (minimum of 1)
- Limitations of the study (minimum of 1)
- Recommendations regarding potential application for future practice that are insightful and appropriate.
Expert Solution Preview
Introduction:
As a medical professor, it is my duty to evaluate scholarly nursing articles related to medical research questions. In this assignment, I have chosen a qualitative or mixed methods scholarly nursing article related to the PICOT question of the effect of complementary and alternative therapy in comparison to lifestyle management and pharmacological treatment on blood sugar levels in elderly patients with diabetes.
Article Summary:
The article I have chosen is titled “Exploring the use of complementary and alternative medicine in diabetes self-management among Black Caribbean and White British women: a qualitative study” written by Kiran M. Sarma, Jane Wilcock, and Vari Drennan. The purpose of the study is to explore the use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) in diabetes self-management among Black Caribbean and White British women. The research design is a qualitative study that used semi-structured interviews and focus groups for data collection. The sample size included 23 participants (12 Black Caribbean and 11 White British women). The findings of the study suggest that CAM use among women with diabetes is influenced by various factors, including cultural beliefs, personal experiences, and access to resources.
Strengths:
One major strength of this study is its focus on understanding the use of CAM in diabetes self-management among Black Caribbean and White British women. This study contributes to the growing body of research on the use of CAM in managing chronic diseases like diabetes, from a cultural and social perspective.
Limitations:
One limitation of this study is the relatively small sample size, which may limit the generalizability of the findings. Additionally, the study only includes women, which may not accurately represent the experiences of men with diabetes.
Recommendations:
Based on this study, recommendations for future practice include recognizing the importance of cultural and social factors in CAM use for diabetes self-management. It is suggested that healthcare providers should be aware of patients’ CAM use and integrate it with lifestyle management and pharmacological treatment. Future research should aim to investigate the use of CAM among men, as well as larger sample sizes to achieve greater generalization of results.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, this article provides a qualitative study that sheds light on the role of CAM in diabetes self-management among Black Caribbean and White British women. It is recommended that healthcare providers should acknowledge patients’ CAM use in their treatment plan and integrate it with lifestyle management and pharmacological treatment strategies. More research is required to investigate the use of CAM among diverse populations and determine its effectiveness in managing diabetes.
