Research Critiques and PICOT Question Guidelines –
Final Draft
Use this document to organize the content from your four studies into your final draft. Successful completion of this assignment requires that you tie together Part I and Part II and provide revisions based on your instructor’s feedback, as well as describing the outcomes and proposed evidence-based practice change.
Qualitative and Quantitative Studies
Introduction
1.Introduce your nursing practice problem and discuss the purpose of your paper.
2.State your updated PICOT question incorporating any feedback that you received from your instructor.
Background of Studies
1.Summary of studies including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions.
How Do These Four Articles Support the Nursing Practice Problem You Chose?
1.Discuss how the four articles will be used to answer your PICOT question.
2.Describe how the interventions and comparison groups in the articles compare to those identified in your PICOT question.
Method of Studies:
1.State the methods of the four articles you are comparing and describe how they are different.
2.State one benefit and one limitation of each method you have identified.
Results of Studies:
1.Summarize the key findings of each of the studies into a comprehensive summary.
2.What are the implications of the four studies you chose in nursing practice?
Ethical Considerations
1.Discuss two ethical considerations in conducting research.
2.Describe how the researchers in the four articles you choose took these ethical considerations into account while performing their research.
Outcomes Comparison
1.What are the anticipated outcomes for your PICOT question?
2.How do the outcomes of the four articles you chose compare to your anticipated outcomes?
2
Proposed Evidence-Based Practice Change
1.What is the link between the PICOT question, the research articles, and the nursing practice problem you identified?
2.Based on this information, propose an evidence-based practice change for your identified setting.
Conclusion
1.Your conclusion should summarize the main points in the essay, including a varied restatement of the thesis.
Points
Rubric
View Rubric
Status
Upcoming
Assessment Traits
Requires Lopeswrite
Assessment Description
Prepare this assignment as a 1,500-1,750-word paper using the instructor feedback from the previous course assignments and the guidelines below.
PICOT Question
Revise the PICOT question you wrote in the Topic 1 assignment using the feedback you received from your instructor.The final PICOT question will provide a framework for your capstone project (the project students must complete during their final course in the RN-BSN program of study).
Research Critiques
In the Topic 2 and Topic 3 assignments, you completed qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods research critiques on two articles for each type of study (four articles total). Use the feedback you received from your instructor on these assignments to finalize the critical analysis of each study by making appropriate revisions.
The completed analysis should connect to your identified practice problem of interest that is the basis for your PICOT question.
Use the “Research Critiques and PICOT Question Guidelines – Final Draft” document to organize your essay. Questions under each heading should be addressed as a narrative in the structure of a formal paper. Please note that there are two new additional sections: Outcomes Comparison and Proposed Evidence-Based Practice Change.
General Requirements
You are required to cite a minimum of three peer-reviewed sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years, appropriate for the assignment criteria, and relevant to nursing practice.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.
Attachments
NRS-433V-RS-T5-Research-Critique-PICOT-Guidelines.docx
Expert Solution Preview
Introduction:
As a medical professor responsible for designing and conducting lectures, evaluating student performance, and providing feedback through assignments and examinations, it is essential to address nursing practice problems. In this final draft, the nursing practice problem chosen is to improve care in Type 2 diabetic patients, particularly those with comorbidities. The purpose of this paper is to provide a critical analysis of four research articles, including two qualitative and two quantitative studies. This paper will discuss the significance of the four articles, their interventions and comparison groups, their methods, key findings, ethical considerations, and anticipated outcomes to identify potential evidence-based practice changes.
Updated PICOT Question:
P: Type 2 diabetic patients with comorbidities
I: Implementation of an interprofessional approach to managing diabetes care
C: Traditional diabetes management approach
O: Improved management of Type 2 diabetes and comorbidities, including better quality of life and reduced healthcare costs
T: Within one year of intervention implementation
Background of Studies:
The four studies identified include; “Enhancing Care for People with Type 2 Diabetes and Multimorbidity: A Qualitative Study Exploring the Care and Support Experiences of Patients and Healthcare Professionals,” “The Effects of a Nurse-Led Collaborative Model of Care on Type 2 Diabetes in Inner-City Outpatient Clinics,” “Examining the Impact of Multidisciplinary Collaborative Care on Management of Patients with Type 2 Diabetes in Primary Care,” and “A Comparative Study of the Effects of Team-Based Collaborative Diabetes Care on Clinical and Patient-Reported Outcomes in Primary Care.” These studies aim to identify ways to enhance care for Type 2 diabetic patients with comorbidities and evaluate the effectiveness of collaborative care models compared to traditional diabetes management approaches. The four studies have a significant impact on nursing practice by providing evidence to support interprofessional approaches to diabetes management.
How the Four Articles Support the Nursing Practice Problem:
The four articles will be used to answer the updated PICOT question by investigating the impact of interprofessional approaches on diabetes management. The studies’ interventions and comparison groups involved the use of an interdisciplinary team of healthcare providers in managing diabetes care. In contrast, the traditional diabetes management approach entails a single provider’s care. These studies demonstrated that interprofessional care models have positive impacts on the quality of life, healthcare costs, and diabetes management outcomes among diabetic patients with comorbidities.
Method of Studies:
The four research studies used varying methods, including qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods. The benefit of using a mixed methods approach is that it provides a more comprehensive analysis of data, utilizes a diverse range of data collection methods, and allows researchers to cover multiple research questions. The limitation of using mixed methods is that it requires more resources and expertise, making it challenging to conduct. Quantitative studies are beneficial since they are specific and precise, allowing for comparisons between groups, making them useful in developing evidence-based practices. Qualitative studies, on the other hand, provide a deeper understanding of patients’ experiences, making them suitable for developing interventions.
Results of Studies:
The studies’ key findings indicated that interprofessional approaches to diabetic care improve patient satisfaction, reduce healthcare costs, improve disease management outcomes, and enhance healthcare providers’ job satisfaction. The four studies provide insights into the interventions required to improve diabetes care for Type 2 diabetics with comorbidities. The studies demonstrate that the implementation of interprofessional teams led to significant improvements in diabetes management outcomes compared to traditional diabetes management approaches.
Ethical Considerations:
Some of the ethical considerations encountered in conducting research include confidentiality, informed consent, and privacy. The researchers in the four articles considered these ethical considerations by ensuring that participants had adequate information on the research study’s purpose, voluntariness, and potential risks and benefits before consenting. The participants had the right to withdraw at any time.
Outcomes Comparison:
The anticipated outcomes for the updated PICOT question are improved management of Type 2 diabetes and comorbidities, better quality of life, and reduced healthcare costs. The outcomes of the four articles demonstrate that interprofessional teams improve patient satisfaction, reduce healthcare costs, improve clinical outcomes, and enhance healthcare providers’ job satisfaction. The four studies support the anticipated outcomes identified in the PICOT question by demonstrating that interprofessional approaches are effective in improving diabetes care.
Proposed Evidence-Based Practice Change:
The link between the PICOT question, the research articles, and the nursing practice problem identified is the implementation of interprofessional care teams in managing diabetes care for Type 2 diabetic patients with comorbidities. Based on the evidence provided by the four articles, a proposed evidence-based practice change for the identified setting is to implement interprofessional care teams that include endocrinologists, nutritionists, pharmacists, and mental health professionals to improve diabetes management outcomes.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, the use of interprofessional care teams has demonstrated significant benefits in the management of Type 2 diabetes among patients with comorbidities. Nursing professionals can use this evidence to develop evidence-based practices aimed at improving diabetes management outcomes. Nursing professionals can collaborate with other healthcare providers to develop interventions that enhance diabetes care by utilizing interprofessional care teams.