Practice Experience: Applying Key Interventions to a Practice Problem
- practice problem: excessive/unnecessary use of restraints and seclusion in mental health children
The final step is to develop the plan discussing the steps clearly and succinctly. The plan must be evidence-based.
Post an explanation of how you could apply key interventions supported by the scholarly research evidence to potentially help resolve the issue in measurable ways.
Expert Solution Preview
Introduction
The excessive and unnecessary use of restraints and seclusion in mental health children is a significant practice problem in the healthcare industry. It is crucial to implement key interventions supported by scholarly research evidence to resolve this issue in measurable ways. In this assignment, we will discuss how to apply these key interventions to potentially help resolve this issue.
Answer
There are several key interventions that can be employed to resolve the issue of excessive and unnecessary use of restraints and seclusion in mental health children. These interventions are supported by scholarly research evidence and can help in resolving this problem in measurable ways.
Firstly, a good intervention is to implement trauma-focused cognitive-behavioral therapy (TF-CBT) sessions for the children who have been subjected to restraint or seclusion. Research has shown that TF-CBT is effective in treating anxiety, depression, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). By implementing TF-CBT sessions, we can help reduce the likelihood of future incidents of restraint and seclusion.
Secondly, staff training on de-escalation techniques and alternative behavioral interventions can significantly reduce the use of restraints and seclusion. Staff should be trained on how to notice and manage early signs of distress in children, so they can intervene before any situation escalates. They should also be trained on how to use alternative behavioral interventions to address challenging behavior, which reduces the possibility of using restraints or seclusion.
Lastly, the use of evidence-based clinical decision-making algorithms can help in reducing the use of restraints and seclusion in mental health children. This algorithm provides a clear decision-making approach that guides clinicians through the assessment and intervention options. By implementing clinical decision-making algorithms, clinicians can provide consistent, appropriate, and evidence-based care to patients, hence reducing the use of restraints and seclusion.
In conclusion, implementing interventions such as Trauma-focused cognitive-behavioral therapy, staff training on de-escalation techniques and alternative behavioral interventions, and the use of evidence-based clinical decision-making algorithms can significantly help resolve the issue of excessive and unnecessary use of restraints and seclusion in mental health children. These interventions can be supported by scholarly research evidence and can help in resolving this problem in measurable ways.
