Evidence-Based Practice Guideline
Write a fully developed and detailed APA essay addressing each of the following points/questions. There is no required word count; be sure to completely answer all the questions for each question in detail. Separate each section in your paper with a clear heading that allows your professor to know which bullet you are addressing in that section of your paper. Sources are not required; however, if sources are used make sure to cite using the APA writing style for the essay and complete a reference page. The cover page is required. Review the rubric criteria for this assignment.
Utilize the databases identified in the text to locate an Evidence-Based Practice Guideline, related to your topic identified in Module 1. Perform a rapid critical appraisal of the Evidence-Based Guideline by answering the following questions in APA format. All questions should be answered in detail and explanations offered according to guideline content when applicable.
- Who were the guideline developers?
- Were the developers of the guideline representative of key stakeholders in this specialty (inter-disciplinary)?
- Who funded the guideline development?
- Were any of the guideline developers funded researchers of the reviewed studies?
- Did the team have a valid development strategy?
- Was an explicit (how decisions were made), sensible, and impartial process used to identify, select, and combine evidence?
- Did its developers carry out comprehensive, reproducible literature review within the past 12 months of its publication/revision?
- Were all important options and outcomes considered?
- Is each recommendation in the guideline tagged by the level/strength of evidence upon which it is based and linked to the scientific evidence?
- Do the guidelines make explicit recommendations (reflecting value judgments about the outcomes)?
- Has the guideline been subjected to peer review and testing?
- Is the intent of use provided (i.e. national, regional, local)?
- Are the recommendations clinically relevant?
- Will the recommendations help me in caring for my patients?
- Are the recommendations practical/feasible? Are resources (people and equipment) available?
- Are the recommendations a major variation from current practice? Can the outcomes be measured through standard care?
Be sure to include the database from which the guideline was obtained and please submit a copy of the guideline with your paper.
Your APA formatted paper fully answer each question in complete sentences.
Assignment Expectations:
Length: Clearly and fully answer all questions; include database; attach a copy of the guidelineStructure: Include a title page and reference page (if sources were used) in APA format. Your essay must include an introduction and a conclusion.References: Use appropriate APA style in-text citations and references for all resources utilized to answer the questions. No minimum sources are required for this assignment; if sources are used APA format is required.Rubric: This assignment uses a rubric for scoring. Please review it as part of your assignment preparation and again prior to submission to ensure you have addressed its criteria at the highest level.Format: Save your assignment as a Microsoft Word document (.doc or .docx) or a PDF document (.pdf)File name: Name your saved file according to your first initial, last name, and the assignment number (for example, “RHall Assignment 1.docx”)
Expert Solution Preview
Introduction:
Evidence-Based Practice Guidelines are structured recommendations that assist the medical professionals to provide optimal care based on the most current scientific evidence. The following essay provides a rapid critical appraisal of an Evidence-Based Practice Guideline that has been retrieved from a database related to the topic identified in Module 1.
Question:
Utilize the databases identified in the text to locate an Evidence-Based Practice Guideline related to your topic identified in Module 1. Perform a rapid critical appraisal of the Evidence-Based Guideline by answering the following questions in APA format.
Answer:
The guideline was retrieved from the Pubmed database, which is a large database of medical literature managed by the US National Library of Medicine. The guideline is titled “Clinical Practice Guideline for the Diagnosis, Evaluation, and Management of Adults and Children with Asthma,” developed by a panel of experts from the National Asthma Education and Prevention Program (NAEPP).
– Who were the guideline developers?
The guideline developers were panel members from the National Asthma Education and Prevention Program (NAEPP). The NAEPP is an initiative of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) of the National Institutes of Health (NIH).
– Were the developers of the guideline representative of key stakeholders in this specialty (inter-disciplinary)?
Yes, the guideline developers were diverse and included healthcare professionals such as pulmonologists, allergists, pediatricians, nurses, and respiratory therapists. The panel also included representatives from patient advocacy groups.
– Who funded the guideline development?
The guideline was funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) of the National Institutes of Health (NIH).
– Were any of the guideline developers funded researchers of the reviewed studies?
There is no information available about whether any of the guideline developers were funded researchers of the reviewed studies.
– Did the team have a valid development strategy?
Yes, the team utilized a valid development strategy. The guideline development process involved a comprehensive review of the scientific evidence related to asthma diagnosis, management, and treatment.
– Was an explicit (how decisions were made), sensible, and impartial process used to identify, select, and combine evidence?
Yes, an explicit, sensible, and impartial process was used to identify, select, and combine evidence. The guideline developers used a systematic approach in reviewing the literature and made decisions based on the strength of scientific evidence.
– Did its developers carry out comprehensive, reproducible literature review within the past 12 months of its publication/revision?
There is no information available about when the last literature review was conducted.
– Were all important options and outcomes considered?
Yes, all important options and outcomes were considered. The guideline covers a wide range of topics related to asthma diagnosis, evaluation, and management.
– Is each recommendation in the guideline tagged by the level/strength of evidence upon which it is based and linked to the scientific evidence?
Yes, each recommendation in the guideline is tagged with a level/strength of evidence that is linked to scientific evidence.
– Do the guidelines make explicit recommendations (reflecting value judgments about the outcomes)?
Yes, the guideline includes explicit recommendations based on the strength of evidence and values related to patient-centered care.
– Has the guideline been subjected to peer review and testing?
Yes, the guideline has been subjected to expert peer review and testing.
– Is the intent of use provided (i.e., national, regional, local)?
Yes, the guideline provides an intent of use at a national level.
– Are the recommendations clinically relevant?
Yes, the recommendations are clinically relevant.
– Will the recommendations help me in caring for my patients?
Yes, the recommendations will help medical professionals provide optimal care to patients with asthma.
– Are the recommendations practical/feasible? Are resources (people and equipment) available?
Yes, the recommendations are practical and feasible. However, certain aspects of the guidelines may require additional resources.
– Are the recommendations a major variation from current practice? Can the outcomes be measured through standard care?
The recommendations are not a major variation from current practice, and the outcomes can be measured through standard care.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, the Clinical Practice Guideline for the Diagnosis, Evaluation, and Management of Adults and Children with Asthma retrieved from Pubmed database is a comprehensive and evidence-based guideline developed by a diverse panel of experts from the National Asthma Education and Prevention Program. The guideline reflects on the latest scientific evidence and provides explicit recommendations based on the strength of evidence and values related to patient-centered care. The guideline is practical and feasible and will help medical professionals provide optimal care to patients with asthma.
