For this week’s discussion, use the Saudi Digital Library to locate a scholarly journal article that details the use of implementation science to advance quality improvement in healthcare.
Summarize the article to include the healthcare setting, the quality initiative, the methodology, and outcomes.
Was there a framework used to guide the implementation?
Did the author(s) describe any barriers to implementation?
Was there improvement and if so, was the improvement sustained?
Discuss what additional or alternative quality improvement methods, implementation science approaches, and framework you would have used or recommended.
Describe two key takeaways from this article that you would incorporate into a similar quality improvement project in the future.
Expert Solution Preview
Introduction:
As a Harvard University Professor, it is essential to incorporate the latest developments in healthcare quality improvement in our lectures and prepare our students for the challenges they may face in the healthcare industry.
To prepare for this week’s discussion, I have used the Saudi Digital Library to locate a scholarly journal article that details the use of implementation science to advance quality improvement in healthcare.
Article Summary:
The article found is “Using Implementation Science to Advance Quality Improvement in Healthcare: A Guide for Practitioners” by Kitson et al. The healthcare setting in focus was a hospital in Australia looking to improve the quality of care for stroke patients. The quality initiative involved the implementation of evidence-based practices for post-stroke care. The methodology used was a multi-faceted approach, including education and training, provision of tools and guidelines, and multidisciplinary team collaboration. The study measured the outcomes through a pre-implementation and post-implementation audit of clinical practices.
Framework Used and Barriers:
The authors used the Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services (PARIHS) framework to guide the implementation of the quality initiative. The framework evaluates the interaction between the evidence being used, the context in which it is being implemented, and the facilitation of the process. The authors identified several barriers to implementation, including resistance to change, conflicting priorities, and lack of understanding of the evidence-based practices.
Improvement and Sustainability:
The study found significant improvement in the quality of care for stroke patients in the hospital after the implementation of the quality initiative. The improvements were sustained over time, proving the long-term effectiveness of the implementation.
Additional or Alternative Methods and Key Takeaways:
In a similar quality improvement project, I would recommend involving patients and their families in decision-making and care planning. Also, using a human-centered design approach may enhance the implementation process.
The two key takeaways from this article that can be incorporated into similar projects in the future are the importance of context-specific implementation and the need for a multifaceted approach in the implementation process. Effective implementation of evidence-based practices in healthcare requires an understanding of the context in which it is being implemented and a collaborative effort by all stakeholders involved.
#Discussion
