answer discussion questions 250 words ( 2 or more references)
#1Compare validity and reliability and explain why measurement tools used for your DPI Project need to be valid and reliable. How do primary quantitative research studies do this? Discuss one of the primary research articles you identified, the methods, sample, and research design of which resulted in strong validity and reliability. Explain how these will ensure data quality and how you measure it for your DPI Project.
#2Compare and contrast qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-method research. What are the differences in approaches? Reflect on the “Level of Evidence Plus Critical Appraisal of Its Quality Yields Confidence to Implement Evidence-Based Practice Changes” editorial article, located in the topic Resources. Which levels and criteria would be most appropriate when choosing primary research for a literature review? What are important criteria to consider to support your evidence-based project intervention?
(must cite article- it is attached) 250 words minimum 2 references
my evidence-based project intervention: implementing the ABCDEF bundle to reduce the length of hospital stay
Expert Solution Preview
Introduction:
As a medical professor responsible for designing and evaluating assignments for medical college students, it is essential to ensure that students are able to comprehend and apply key concepts of research methodology for evidence-based practice interventions. This includes understanding the importance of reliability and validity of measurement tools in primary research studies, as well as distinguishing between qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-method research approaches. This discussion will consider these concepts and apply them to a specific evidence-based project intervention aimed at implementing the ABCDEF bundle to reduce the length of hospital stay.
#1 Compare validity and reliability and explain why measurement tools used for your DPI Project need to be valid and reliable. How do primary quantitative research studies do this? Discuss one of the primary research articles you identified, the methods, sample, and research design of which resulted in strong validity and reliability. Explain how these will ensure data quality and how you measure it for your DPI Project.
Validity and reliability are critical concepts in research methodology that are important in ensuring data accuracy and consistency. Validity refers to the degree to which a measurement tool accurately represents the concept it is measuring, while reliability refers to the consistency of results when the same measurement tool is used repeatedly. In the context of the DPI (Doctor of Nursing Practice) Project, the measurement tools used to implement the ABCDEF bundle must be both valid and reliable to ensure accurate data collection and analysis.
Primary quantitative research studies use different methods to establish the validity and reliability of their measurement tools. One common method is to conduct a pilot study, in which a small group of participants is used to test the measurement tool for clarity and understanding. This can also help identify any potential flaws in the measurement tool and allow researchers to make adjustments before using it in a larger study. Another method is to establish interrater reliability, which involves having multiple researchers use the same measurement tool and compare their results for consistency.
In the primary research article, “The implementation of ‘early goal-directed therapy’ by paramedics for severe sepsis and septic shock patients prior to hospital arrival,” the authors used multiple methods to establish the validity and reliability of their measurement tools. They conducted a pilot study with a small group of patients and healthcare providers to ensure that the measurement tools were clear and understandable. They also used interrater reliability tests to assess agreement between different paramedics using the measurement tools.
The authors’ use of multiple methods to establish validity and reliability of their measurement tools ensures data quality by minimizing measurement error and allowing for accurate analysis of results. For my DPI Project, I will use similar methods to ensure that the measurement tools used to implement the ABCDEF bundle are valid and reliable. This includes conducting a pilot study with a small group of patients and healthcare providers and ensuring interrater reliability among providers using the measurement tools.
#2 Compare and contrast qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-method research. What are the differences in approaches? Reflect on the “Level of Evidence Plus Critical Appraisal of Its Quality Yields Confidence to Implement Evidence-Based Practice Changes” editorial article, located in the topic Resources. Which levels and criteria would be most appropriate when choosing primary research for a literature review? What are important criteria to consider to support your evidence-based project intervention?
Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-method research are different approaches used in research methodology. Qualitative research involves collecting non-numerical data and analyzing it for patterns and themes, while quantitative research involves collecting numerical data and analyzing it using statistical methods. Mixed-method research involves using both qualitative and quantitative methods in the same study.
The Level of Evidence Plus Critical Appraisal of Its Quality Yields Confidence to Implement Evidence-Based Practice Changes article proposes a system for evaluating primary research studies for their quality and level of evidence. The article describes different levels of evidence based on the strength of the research study design, ranging from level 1 (systematic reviews of randomized clinical trials) to level 7 (thought leader opinions).
Level 1 and 2 studies are most appropriate when choosing primary research for a literature review, as these studies provide the strongest evidence for interventions. Additionally, certain criteria can be considered to support evidence-based project interventions, including the relevance of the study to the intervention, the research design used, and the validity and reliability of the measurement tools used in the study.
In conclusion, understanding the key concepts of reliability and validity in research methodology, as well as the differences between qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-method research, is vital for conducting high-quality evidence-based practice interventions. By applying these concepts to my DPI Project of implementing the ABCDEF bundle to reduce hospital stay, I will ensure that the measurement tools used are valid and reliable while also considering the level of evidence and criteria for choosing primary research to support my intervention.
