Researchers must protect participants and be aware of appropriate methods for obtaining information. What ethical considerations are important to research? In about 2 pages, write an analysis of the ethical concerns in the 3 diverse psychological research studies below. Be sure to include a paragraph of overall ethical consideration.
This paper should be 2-3 pages in length and use APA formatting (cover page, paper body formatting, citations, and references: If you use any outside sources, please cite those sources in APA citation format.
Haslam, S. A., & Reicher, S. D. (2012). Contesting the ‘nature’ of conformity: What Milgram and Zimbardo’s studies really show. Plos Biology, 10(11), doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001426
Larsen, K. S. (1974). Conformity in the Asch experiment. The Journal Of Social Psychology, 94(2), 303-304. doi:10.1080/00224545.1974.9923224
Mischel, W., Ayduk, O., Berman, M. G., Casey, B. J., Gotlib, I. H., Jonides, J., & … Shoda, Y. (2011). ‘Willpower’ over the life span: Decomposing self-regulation. Social Cognitive And Affective Neuroscience, 6(2), 252-256. doi:10.1093/scan/nsq081
Expert Solution Preview
Introduction: Ethical considerations are critical in psychological research, where participants’ welfare and dignity must be upheld. Researchers have the responsibility to ensure that participants’ rights are protected, and the study’s benefits outweigh any potential risks or harm. This paper will analyze the ethical concerns in three diverse psychological research studies and provide an overview of overall ethical considerations.
Analysis:
Haslam and Reicher’s (2012) study on conformity raises concerns about participants’ psychological harm and deception. The study involved a role-playing experiment where participants were divided into prisoners and guards, with guards given power over prisoners. The researchers observed that prisoners conformed to the authority of the guards, which raised ethical issues about deception since the prisoners were misled about the study’s purpose. The study’s approach also exposed participants to psychological harm due to potential emotional stress and trauma from playing the prisoner role. Ethical considerations for this study include obtaining informed consent, minimizing harm, and debriefing participants to ensure they understand the study’s purpose.
Larsen’s (1974) study on conformity examined the extent to which participants conform to group norms and predetermined answers. The ethical concern with this study was that participants might feel pressure to conform to group norms, which could affect their autonomy and individuality. While the study itself did not pose any immediate risks, it raised questions about the potential long-term effects of being exposed to social pressure to conform. Ethical considerations for this study include ensuring voluntary participation, the right to withdraw, and anonymity in responses.
Mischel et al.’s (2011) study on self-regulation examined the various factors that influence willpower over an individual’s lifespan. The study raises ethical concerns about privacy since participants were required to complete questionnaires on personal and sensitive information, including their health and habits. The study’s approach could also pose risks to participants who may become self-conscious about their behavior and develop anxiety about their self-control abilities. Ethical considerations for this study include obtaining informed consent and maintaining confidentiality and anonymity in participants’ responses.
Overall ethical considerations in psychological research include obtaining informed consent, minimizing harm, ensuring confidentiality and anonymity, and debriefing participants. Psychologists must also consider cultural differences and potential power imbalances between the researcher and participants. Researchers must uphold their ethical responsibilities to protect participants’ welfare and dignity and adhere to ethical guidelines as laid out by professional associations.
Reference
Haslam, S. A., & Reicher, S. D. (2012). Contesting the ‘nature’ of conformity: What Milgram and Zimbardo’s studies really show. Plos Biology, 10(11), doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001426
Larsen, K. S. (1974). Conformity in the Asch experiment. The Journal Of Social Psychology, 94(2), 303-304. doi:10.1080/00224545.1974.9923224
Mischel, W., Ayduk, O., Berman, M. G., Casey, B. J., Gotlib, I. H., Jonides, J., & Shoda, Y. (2011). ‘Willpower’ over the life span: Decomposing self-regulation. Social Cognitive And Affective Neuroscience, 6(2), 252-256. doi:10.1093/scan/nsq081