Word Analysis of Case Study: Fetal Abnormality, health and medicine homework help Nursing Assignment Help

How to solve
Word Analysis of Case Study: Fetal Abnormality, health and medicine homework help Nursing Assignment Help

Introduction:
This analysis is based on the given case study “Fetal Abnormality”, which revolves around a pregnant woman named Jessica, who finds out that her fetus has a severe abnormality. The case study explores the moral and ethical challenges faced by Jessica, her husband Marco, her friend Maria, and Dr. Wilson. This analysis will address the theories being used by each of these individuals to determine the moral status of the fetus, the influence of the theory on their recommendations for action, and my personal stance on the matter.

Question 1:
Which theory or theories are being used by Jessica, Marco, Maria, and Dr. Wilson to determine the moral status of the fetus? Explain.

The individuals in the case study are using different theories to determine the moral status of the fetus. Jessica and Marco are using the Virtue Theory, which considers the fetus’s moral status based on the parents’ virtues and values. Maria leans towards Utilitarianism, which entails maximizing the overall well-being for the greatest number of individuals involved. Lastly, Dr. Wilson follows the Deontology theory, which argues that actions are morally right or wrong based on intentions, regardless of the consequences.

Question 2:
How does the theory determine or influence each of their recommendation for action?

Jessica wants to keep the baby because it is consistent with her moral values, and doing otherwise would conflict with her virtues. She draws strength from her strong Christian background, which shapes her worldview on life and pregnancy. Marco concurs with his wife Jessica’s decision to keep the baby, aligning with their family’s values. Maria, on the other hand, leans towards abortion, deeming it the most practical solution and the one that will maximize overall happiness. Dr. Wilson is against any form of abortion, as it goes against his moral principles as a practitioner to harm any form of life. He believes that the risk of malformation does not justify killing the life of the fetus.

Question 3:
What theory do you agree with? How would that theory determine or influence the recommendation for action?

In determining the moral status of the fetus, I align with the Virtue Theory, as it seems to be the most comprehensive and empathetic moral theory. It acknowledges diverse values, virtues, and cultures surrounding the issue, providing enough room for personal judgment. In alignment with this theory, I would advise Jessica to follow her heart and values and keep the baby, and I would support her in any way possible. I would also advise Maria to acknowledge the moral values and virtues of Jessica and Marco, highlighting how abortion would conflict with their moral convictions. Dr. Wilson’s Deontological approach is too rigid, ignoring the complex nature of such issues. In conclusion, while Jessica, Marco, Maria, and Dr. Wilson approach the issue from different perspectives, a comprehensive medical approach requires evaluating scientific facts, medical laws, and moral considerations.

Conclusion:
The “Fetal Abnormality” case study presents a delicate balancing act between science and morality, which poses significant challenges in medical practice. The ethical considerations surrounding the issue necessitate a sober consideration of tangible facts and intangible moral considerations in rendering decision. This analysis of the moral theories used by Jessica, Marco, Maria, and Dr. Wilson highlights the need to engage all parties in a friendly dialogue from diverse perspectives. As medical professionals, we must reiterate that medical knowledge and legal jurisprudence are necessary but not sufficient guides to tackle complex ethical dilemmas presented.