Week 4 – DiscussionNo unread replies.No replies.
Your initial discussion thread is due on Day 3 (Thursday) and you have until Day 7 (Monday) to respond to your classmates. Your grade will reflect both the quality of your initial post and the depth of your responses. Refer to the Discussion Forum Grading Rubric under the Settings icon above for guidance on how your discussion will be evaluated.
Joint Commission Standards and Processes
Prior to beginning work on this discussion, read chapter 7 from the course text. Additionally, you will use the following resources:
- The Joint Commission E-dition Standards Manual, located in the UAGC Library
- Written directions for accessing the Joint Commission E-dition standards manual (Links to an external site.)
- Video directions for accessing the Joint Commission E-dition standards manual (Links to an external site.)
- The Joint Commission The Source, located in the UAGC Library
- Written directions for accessing the Joint Commission The Source (Links to an external site.)
- Video directions for accessing the Joint Commission The Source (Links to an external site.)
- Interpreting Joint Commission standards: FAQs (Links to an external site.)
- Joint Commission Resources (Links to an external site.)
Health care providers are often accredited by an external body. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) provide an updated list of approved accrediting organizations. For this discussion, we are focusing on the acute care hospital. Below are fourteen of the categories in The Joint Commission E-dition Standards Manual and accreditation process topics. The topics for this discussion are assigned by students’ last names. See the chart below for your assigned topic.
Topics Student Assignment Based upon Last NameEnvironment of Care (EC)
Human Resources (HR) Student last name begins with C ( my last name is Carter)
Note: The (*) indicates measures found under Accreditation Processes
For your assigned topic, access The Joint Commission E-dition Standards Manual and The Joint Commission’s publication The Source. To access this information, follow the steps below. If you prefer, there are written directions with screenshots or videos of the steps to reach both in the UAGC Library linked above.
From the homepage of the University of Arizona Global Campus Library, click on Find Articles & More in the purple bar near the top of the page. Next, take the following steps:
- Click on Databases by Subject
- Click on Health & Medicine
- Click on Joint Commission E-dition for the Standards Manual. Review the standard assigned to you.
- Next, go back to Health & Medicine in the UAGC Library. Then click on Joint Commission: The Source link located just below the Joint Commission E-dition link. Do not access The Source via the Joint Commission E-dition link or it will ask you to pay a fee.
- To select two articles, do one of the following:
- Select two journal articles from The Source that were published within the past 5-8 years pertaining to your assigned topic. Please use The Source tip sheet (Links to an external site.) for guidance to find what you need through The Source.
- Select two journal articles from either Google Scholar or the University of Arizona Global Campus Library Databases.
In your initial post, identify the assigned topic at the top of your post and summarize the assigned standard. Once you have located two articles that address your standard, you will create the following for each article, which means you will have two outlines with the following information in your initial post:
- Provide the title and author(s) of the article.
- Summarize the content of the article.
- Discuss how the information from the article applies to the standard requirements.
- Discuss why the standard is important to health care.
- Discuss any best practices identified in the article.
- Discuss at least one new concept that you learned from the article.
Initial Post: Your initial post should be 250 to 300 words. Cite and reference your two articles in APA format as outlined in the Writing Center’s Introduction to APA (Links to an external site.).
https://content.bridgepointeducation.com/curriculum/file/ac49863d-0a57-4b14-b83f-9b3b29836917/1/Joint%20Commission%20E%20dition%20tip%20sheet.pdf
https://uagc.mediaspace.kaltura.com/media/Joint%20Commission%20E-dition/1_5losdm2u
https://content.bridgepointeducation.com/curriculum/file/c7f30dcf-40d5-439f-b2ea-4f8ae5fe2f38/1/The%20Source.pdf
https://uagc.mediaspace.kaltura.com/media/Joint%20Commission%20The%20Source/1_ym0dy2pi
https://www.jointcommission.org/standards/standard-faqs/
https://www.jcrinc.com/
https://content.bridgepointeducation.com/curriculum/file/c7f30dcf-40d5-439f-b2ea-4f8ae5fe2f38/1/The%20Source.pdf
Expert Solution Preview
Introduction:
As a medical professor in charge of creating college assignments and answers for medical college students, I find it important to discuss Joint Commission standards and processes. Accreditation by external bodies such as the CMS is imperative for healthcare providers, particularly acute care hospitals. In this discussion, we will focus on two out of the fourteen categories in The Joint Commission E-dition Standards Manual and accreditation process topics. My assigned topic is Human Resources (HR).
Human Resources (HR) Standard:
The HR standard focuses on ensuring that the organization’s workforce is competent and qualified to provide safe, high-quality care. This can be achieved by maintaining comprehensive records, conducting background checks, providing required training, and regularly evaluating employees’ performances. The Standard also recognizes that the efficient use of staff promotes patient safety and quality outcomes.
Article 1:
Title: Competency-Based Medical Education: Review of the Literature and Development of Competency Framework for Family Medicine and Primary Care
Authors: David Price, Jaimie Honeyman-Buck, David Cohen, Mwidimi Ndosi, Rachel Mayne, Pam McKinstry
Summary: This article aims to identify the current state of competency-based medical education (CBME) and its challenges and benefits. The authors reviewed the literature on CBME and its implementation across different healthcare systems. The authors additionally proposed a CBME framework for family medicine and primary care that could replace the existing traditional model of medical education.
Application to the Standard Requirements and Importance to Healthcare:
The article highlights the importance of having a competent workforce that can provide high-quality care to patients. The proposed CBME framework can assist organizations in evaluating their employees’ current competency levels and continuously improving their skills. This aligns with the HR standard’s requirements, particularly in training and evaluating employees’ performances. Having a skilled workforce is critical in reducing medical errors and providing safe care, emphasizing the standard’s importance in promoting excellent health outcomes.
Best Practices and New Concepts:
The proposed CBME framework for family medicine and primary care uses a practical and evidence-based approach to improve the quality of medical education. It also emphasizes the importance of having a learner-centered approach that caters to individuals’ needs, allowing them to master required competencies efficiently. The article highlights the need for continuous evaluation and improvement as an essential aspect of medical education, ensuring that the workforce is always up to date with new medical advancements.
Article 2:
Title: The Effect of Interprofessional Education on Human Resource Management Outcomes and Patient Care Quality
Authors: Atefeh Taheri-Kharameh, Nasihn Montaseri-Aliabadi, Robabeh Memarian
Summary: The article evaluates the effect of interprofessional education (IPE) on human resource management outcomes and patient care quality in the Iranian healthcare system. The study involved conducting a pretest-posttest design, where healthcare professionals were trained through IPE on essential human resource management skills. Data collected from the study were analyzed using the SPSS software.
Application to the Standard Requirements and Importance to Healthcare:
The article highlights the importance of having an efficient and competent human resource workforce in promoting quality healthcare outcomes. The study found that IPE was effective in improving human resource management outcomes and patient care quality in the Iranian healthcare system. The finding aligns with the HR standard’s requirements, particularly in training and evaluating employees’ performances. IPE can ensure that healthcare professionals have the necessary skills and knowledge to perform their duties effectively, promoting safe and high-quality care.
Best Practices and New Concepts:
The study identified best practices in implementing IPE, such as involving professionals from various disciplines and evaluating the program’s effectiveness. The study also highlights that effective collaboration and teamwork are essential in providing high-quality care to patients. The article highlights that the incorporation of IPE in the medical education curriculum can improve the workforce’s competency and efficiency, ensuring that they deliver safe and high-quality care.
