Critical Thinking Assignment 1:
The Assessment Rubric for Critical Thinking (ARC) Assessment Profile is a written demonstration of your competence to analyze, synthesize, and evaluate a legal problem and create a bridge between theory and application.
A successful ARC project will demonstrate your ability to examine, question, critique, modify, and reflect on a healthcare issue associated with healthcare compliance. This will include utilizing your critical thinking skills to intellectually explore and critically examine a problem/issue, develop a perspective on this problem/issue and provide support in favor of your perspective.
ARC Assignment Profile
The ARC is a ‘tool’ to evaluate critical thinking. The specific 6 elements and tasks of the ARC that you will be graded on include:
1.Communication: Define the problem in your own words.
2.Analysis: Compare & contrast the available solutions within the scenario.
3.Problem Solving: Select one of the available solutions and defend it as your chosen solution.
4.Evaluation: Identify the weaknesses of your chosen solution.
5.Synthesis: Suggest ways to improve/strengthen your chosen solution.
6.Reflection: Reflect on your own thought process after completing the assignment.
a.“What did you learn from this process?”
b.“What would you do differently next time to improve?”
Review the scenario described below.Then answer the questions in an APA style format utilizing your textbook, the internet and the information provided within the scenario to support your analysis. Make sure that you thoroughly respond to each goal as well as each of the questions posed within the goal to successfully complete the assignment.
Scenario #1:
The suspect in a robbery was fleeing from police, when he crossed into oncoming traffic and collided head on with John Doe’s truck, severely injuring Doe, and killing himself. Mr. Doe was airlifted to the local hospital burn unit.
Police investigating the robbery and the ensuing accident demanded that hospital personnel draw blood from the victim, John Doe.
The nurse told police that she was not allowed to draw blood from an unconscious patient. She further stated that police did not have a warrant and could therefore not collect blood samples from a badly injured patient. Furthermore, she reiterated that the patient was not conscious, so he could not give consent.
Choose your perspective for this assignment – you may decide to represent the hospital, nurse, victim, or the police.
ARC Assessment Profile | |
Goal 1: | Communication: Define the problem in your own words. |
Questions: | a. Identify the main idea or problem in the scenario. b. Support your choice of the main idea or problem with c. Organize your findings (details & examples) in a logical and coherent format. |
ARC Assessment Profile | |
Goal 2: | Analysis: Compare & contrast the available solutions within the scenario. |
Questions: | a. Identify 2 possible solutions for the issue and/or problem. b. Compare and contrast the pros and cons for each solution. c. Choose one solution you believe is the best one for addressing/solving the issue and or problem. |
ARC Assessment Profile | |
Goal 3: | Problem Solving: Select one of the available solutions and defend it as your chosen solution. |
Questions: | a. Defend your chosen solution. b. Back up your choice through facts and or evidence that support your solution. |
ARC Assessment Profile | |
Goal 4: | Evaluation: Identify the weaknesses of your chosen solution.
|
Questions: | a. Identify any areas of weakness within your chosen solution. b. Identify hidden assumptions and beliefs you may harbor about your choice of solution. |
ARC Assessment Profile | |
Goal 5: | Synthesis: Suggest ways to improve/strengthen your chosen solution (may use information not contained within the scenario). |
Questions: | a. Identify concepts and ideas from multiple sources that improve or strengthen your solution. b. Identify any new information and the impact that new information may or may not have on your solution. c. Identify potential missing information and the impact that missing information may or may not have on your solution. |
ARC Assessment Profile | |
Goal 6: | Reflection: Reflect on your own thought process after completing the assignment. |
Questions: | a. Identify the strengths and weaknesses in your thought process with this project. b. Was there bias in your thinking? c. What did you learn from doing this project? d. What would you do in a different manner to improve your critical thinking skills process? |
Submit your completed assignment into the designated drop box.
Expert Solution Preview
Introduction:
The ARC Assessment Profile is an essential tool to evaluate critical thinking skills. The assignment comprises six distinct goals, which collectively analyze, synthesize, and evaluate a problem associated with healthcare compliance. The purpose of this assignment is to examine, question, critique, modify, and reflect on a healthcare issue and develop a perspective on this issue. In this answer, we will discuss and provide a solution for Goal 1 of the ARC assignment profile.
Answer:
Goal 1 of the ARC assessment profile requires students to define a problem in their own words. In this scenario, the problem is about drawing blood from an unconscious patient. The police are investigating an accident and requesting the hospital to collect blood samples from the patient. However, the nurse is reluctant to comply, citing that the patient was unconscious and unable to provide consent. The primary issue is whether the police have the authority to collect blood samples from an unconscious patient without their consent or a warrant.
In response to this problem, we need to consider the relevant laws and regulations. The Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution prohibits unreasonable searches and seizures. Generally, the police require a warrant to search a person or property. One exception to this requirement is an exigent circumstance, which is an emergency that requires immediate action. In this scenario, the police may argue that the collection of blood samples is necessary to investigate the accident and identify the suspect involved in the robbery.
However, the nurse has a legal obligation to follow the hospital’s policies and procedures regarding patient care. She cannot draw blood from an unconscious patient without a lawful reason or the patient’s consent. As a healthcare provider, her primary duty is to ensure the safety and welfare of her patients. Therefore, the hospital may refuse to comply with the police request without a warrant or a court order.
In conclusion, the primary problem in this scenario is whether the police have the authority to collect blood samples from an unconscious patient without their consent or a warrant. The nurse is obligated to follow the hospital’s policies and procedures regarding patient care and cannot draw blood without a lawful reason or the patient’s consent. Therefore, the hospital may refuse to comply with the police request in the absence of a warrant or a court order.