1) Write a paper of 1,000–1,200 words that compares and contrasts the competing visions of health care administration among stakeholders, identifies the areas where they conflict, and discusses how those conflicts could be seen in the delivery system.
2) Refer to the assigned readings to incorporate specific examples and details into your paper. (See attachments)
3) Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required. And outline does not have to be submitted as well.
4) This assignment uses a grading rubric (see attachment). Instructors will be using the rubric to grade the assignment; therefore, students should review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment.
Assigned Readings.
1. Access by Edwards, from Hospital & Health Networks (August 2010).
2. The Evidence-Based Road by Birk, from Healthcare Executive (2010).
Please do not hesitate to ask any questions for clarification. This is on a specific topic so please use the topic to form the paper only.
How to solve
Stakeholders Compare and Contrast Essay, health and medicine homework help Nursing Assignment Help
Introduction:
The field of healthcare administration involves an array of stakeholders with differing visions and goals. These various perspectives can lead to conflicts and challenges in the delivery system. In this paper, we will explore the competing visions of health care administration among stakeholders, identify the areas of conflict, and discuss how these conflicts manifest in the delivery system. To provide a comprehensive analysis, we will refer to the assigned readings and incorporate specific examples and details. The paper will follow the APA guidelines for formatting and citations.
Answer:
The competing visions of health care administration among stakeholders can be seen in their differing perspectives on access and evidence-based practices. Access, as discussed by Edwards in the article “Access” from Hospital & Health Networks (August 2010), is a critical component of healthcare administration. Stakeholders such as healthcare providers, insurance companies, and policymakers have varying views on access, leading to conflicts in the delivery system.
One group of stakeholders prioritizes increasing access to healthcare services for all individuals. They argue that healthcare is a fundamental right, and everyone should have equal access to quality care regardless of their socioeconomic status or insurance coverage. This perspective is aligned with the idea of equity in healthcare, ensuring that no one is denied necessary medical services due to financial or social barriers. However, implementing this vision requires significant financial resources and may result in increased costs for other stakeholders, such as healthcare providers and insurance companies.
On the other hand, some stakeholders focus on cost containment and efficiency in healthcare administration. They argue that providing unlimited access to healthcare services for all individuals is not sustainable and could lead to financial strain on the system. These stakeholders prioritize cost-effectiveness and emphasize the need for evidence-based practices to ensure that resources are utilized efficiently. Birk, in the article “The Evidence-Based Road” from Healthcare Executive (2010), explores the importance of evidence-based practices in healthcare administration.
The conflict between stakeholders who prioritize access and those who emphasize cost containment and efficiency is evident in the delivery system. Limited access to healthcare services can lead to delays in receiving care, resulting in adverse health outcomes for individuals who cannot afford timely treatment. This inequality in access is one manifestation of the conflicting visions of healthcare administration. Furthermore, conflicts arise in determining the allocation of resources within the delivery system. Stakeholders advocating for increased access argue for the reallocation of resources to underserved populations, which may be met with resistance from other stakeholders concerned about the financial implications.
Moreover, the conflicting visions of healthcare administration impact decision-making processes within the system. Policymakers often face difficult choices when balancing the needs of different stakeholders. For example, the implementation of policies aimed at increasing access, such as expanding Medicaid coverage, may be met with opposition from stakeholders concerned about the financial burden. These conflicts and challenges make decision-making complex and sometimes contentious, delaying the implementation of effective healthcare policies.
In conclusion, the competing visions of healthcare administration among stakeholders primarily revolve around access and cost containment. The tensions between those advocating for increased access and those emphasizing cost efficiency can be observed in the delivery system. Limited access and disparities in healthcare services are outcomes of these conflicts. Decision-making processes are also influenced by these differing perspectives, often resulting in challenges and delays in implementing effective healthcare policies. As healthcare administrators, understanding and navigating these conflicts are necessary to ensure equitable and efficient healthcare delivery.
