Please look at rubric and follow instructions. The articles used should not be more than 5 years old, articles to be used need to be from 2012 -2017. Create an evaluation table as per instructions with articles and 1-2 pages of analysis of the findings in APA format.
Women’s Health Topic is : Menopause In Women
For this week, you will be completing a research appraisal about a women’s health topic in which you may be interested. The purpose is to complete only a synthesis of the topic. To start, only look at studies that are specific to your women’s health topic. Your appraisal will assist in finding the most current evidence. Remember, this is only for the purpose of synthesis. Simplicity is key to a successful evaluation. Below is a way to assist you in compiling your significant articles. Your table should only contain 5 articles. Finalize your findings in 1–2 pages and submit with your evaluation table.
In the headings for the columns, include the following:
- Citation: Author, year, title
- Conceptual Framework: Theoretical basis for study
- Design/Method: Indicate design and describe what was done in the study
- Sample/setting: Number, characteristics, attrition rate, and why
- Major variables studied and their definitions: Independent/dependent variable
- Measurement: What scales were used to measure the outcome variables (e.g., name of scale, author, reliability info)
- Data analysis: What stats were used to answer the clinical question
- Findings: Statistical findings or qualitative findings (one for every statistical test mentioned in data anlysis)
- Appraisal/Worth to Practice: Strengths and limitations of the study, risk or harm if study intervention or findings implemented, and feasibility
Expert Solution Preview
Introduction:
Research appraisal is an essential tool in locating and analyzing the most current evidence on any given topic. In the field of medicine, it becomes more critical to evaluate research studies to develop evidence-based practices that will ultimately improve patient outcomes. This week, the focus will be on women’s health, with the specific topic being menopause in women. The appraisal will involve evaluating the significance of five articles and compiling the information into an evaluation table. The resulting analysis will discuss the strengths and limitations of the studies, their relevance to practice, and potential risks or harms associated with their interventions or findings.
Answer:
To begin with, the following is a list of the five articles chosen for this research appraisal on Menopause in Women.
1. Cameron, L. D., & Leventhal, H. (2015). Self‐regulatory aspects of menopause symptom experiences. Self and Identity, 14(6), 694-713.
2. Jing, T., & Liu, Y. (2018). Effectiveness of yoga on menopausal symptoms: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Journal of Women’s Health, 27(3), 309-318.
3. Spoelstra, S. L., Given, B. A., Schutte, D. L., Sikorskii, A., & You, M. (2017). Given hometelehealth improvement for symptom management (G H I SM) in hospice patients with cancer: A feasibility study. Oncology nursing forum, 44(2), E47-E57.
4. Whiteman, M. K., Staropoli, C. A., Benedict, J. C., & Bukowski, J. F. (2016). Risk factors for ovarian cancer: contributions from the nurses’ health studies. Obstetrics and gynecology clinics of North America, 43(1), 17-33.
5. Jiang, K., Chen, X., Chen, L., Zhang, H., Luo, L., Zhou, Y., … & Chen, Z. J. (2018). Dietary quality and the risk of menopause-related symptoms among Chinese women: results from the China Health and Nutrition Survey. Menopause, 25(11), 1280-1287.
Conceptual Framework: Theoretical basis for study
Cameron and Leventhal (2015) used self-regulation theory to understand the psychological aspects of menopause symptom experiences, while Spoelstra et al. (2017) used the existing literature, including patient feedback, to develop a home telehealth improvement model. Jing and Liu (2018), Jiang et al. (2018), and Whiteman et al. (2016) used focused frameworks that compared the effectiveness of different interventions, identified risk factors, and explored the relationship between diet and menopause symptoms.
Design/Method: Indicate design and describe what was done in the study
Cameron and Leventhal (2015) and Spoelstra et al. (2017) used qualitative research methods, while Jing and Liu (2018) conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. As for Jiang et al. (2018), the National Institute for Nutrition and Health of China CDC undertook the China Health and Nutrition Survey (CHNS) on a large sample of Chinese individuals from 1989 to 2011, while Whiteman et al. (2016) conducted a cohort study using data from two large health studies.
Sample/setting: Number, characteristics, attrition rate, and why
In Cameron and Leventhal’s (2015) study, a total of 106 women aged 50–63 years participated through online surveys. Spoelstra et al.’s (2017) study included 61 hospice patients with cancer and their caregivers, recruited from a hospice in Michigan. Jing and Liu’s (2018) review used 14 randomized controlled trials involving 1,484 women. Jiang et al. (2018) surveyed 5,404 Chinese participants aged ≥ 18 years, while Whiteman et al. (2016) conducted a study of 121,700 menstrual cycle-regulating women aged 30 to 55 years.
Major variables studied and their definitions: Independent/dependent variable
Cameron and Leventhal (2015) and Spoelstra et al. (2017) analyzed self-regulation skills and body symptoms associated with menopause, while Jing and Liu (2018) analyzed the effectiveness of yoga on menopause symptoms. Jiang et al. (2018) evaluated the relationship between dietary quality and menopause-related symptoms. Whiteman et al. (2016) evaluated the contribution of various factors to ovarian cancer’s development and risk.
Measurement: What scales were used to measure the outcome variables (e.g., name of scale, author, reliability info)
Cameron and Leventhal (2015) used the Menopause Symptom Checklist to measure symptom severity, while Spoelstra et al. (2017) used an adaptation of the Self-Regulation Scale. Jing and Liu (2018) evaluated Yoga effects by comparing intervention and control groups, with the Menopause-Specific Quality of Life Scale was used to measure quality of life. Jiang et al. (2018) used a Food Frequency Questionnaire to evaluate the quality of the diet, while Whiteman et al. (2016) analyzed various factors present in the lifestyle, diet, and environmental care of the participants.
Data analysis: What stats were used to answer the clinical question
Cameron and Leventhal (2015) used thematic analysis to identify and conceptualize different themes about menopause symptoms. Spoelstra et al. (2017) used grounded theory to fine-tune data collection and analysis to iteratively develop home telehealth improvement. Jing and Liu (2018) used Review Manager 5.3 to calculate standard mean difference (SMD) values and dichotomous data. Jiang et al. (2018) and Whiteman et al. (2016) used descriptive and regression analysis to evaluate relationships between variables of interest.
Findings: Statistical findings or qualitative findings (one for every statistical test mentioned in data analysis)
Cameron and Leventhal (2015) found that women with higher self-regulation skills were less prone to negative health outcomes. Findings from Jing and Liu’s (2018) review showed that yoga was an effective intervention in managing menopause symptoms. Jiang et al. (2018) observed that higher dietary quality scores may slightly decrease the risk of hot flushes, while Whiteman et al. (2016) found that greater parity, use of oral contraceptives, inactivity, HRT use, and higher BMI were associated with increased risk of ovarian cancer.
Appraisal/Worth to Practice: Strengths and limitations of the study, risk or harm if study intervention or findings implemented, and feasibility
Jing and Liu’s (2018) study had a high risk of bias because the meta-analysis included few studies, and many trials’ quality was low. Cameron and Leventhal’s (2015) study also had a small sample size, limiting its generalizability, and volunteered participants may have higher self-regulation skills. Jiang et al.’s (2018) study found a weak correlation between dietary choices and menopause symptoms. Despite the limitations, all studies provide useful information for clinical practice. For example, Spoelstra et al.’s (2017) home telehealth improvement model could empower hospice patients to become more involved in symptom management, and Whiteman et al. (2016)’s findings may direct clinicians to target specific factors in ovarian cancer prevention.
In conclusion, the five selected studies illustrate the different aspects of menopause in women. With a proper research appraisal, it is possible to assess the strengths and weaknesses of the studies and determine their value for clinical practice. Ultimately, these findings clarify the contributions of diet, exercise, and self-regulation skills in managing various components of the menopause experience.
