Reading Research Literature Guidelines
Updated 7/6/2017
Purpose
The student will read research literature to determine the research purpose, question, design, population, sample, limitations, data collection and analysis.
Course Outcomes
This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:
CO2: Apply research principles to the interpretation of the content of published research studies. (PO4 and 8)
CO4: Evaluate published nursing research for credibility and lab significance related to evidence-based practice. (PO4 and 8)
Points: This assignment is worth 225 points.
Due Date: Submit the completed Reading Research Literature form (Links to an external site.) by 11:59 p.m. MT Sunday at the end of Week 5.
Requirements
- Download the research articles from the Chamberlain library.
Retrieve the following research articles: Make sure you are viewing the full text PDF. If you view the article in HTML format, you may not be able to see the tables and figures that are referenced in the questions.
Velayutham, S. G., Chandra, S. R., Bharath, S., & Shankar, R. G. (2017). Quantitative balance and gait measurement in patients with frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer diseases: A pilot study. Indian Journal Of Psychological Medicine, 39(2), 176-182. doi:10.4103/0253-7176.203132. (Links to an external site.)
Pals, R. S., Hansen, U. M., Johansen, C. B., Hansen, C. S., Jørgensen, M. E., Fleischer, J., & Willaing, I. (2015). Making sense of a new technology in clinical practice: A qualitative study of patient and physician perspectives. BMC Health Services Research, 15(1), 1-10. doi:10.1186/s12913-015-1071-1 (Links to an external site.)
- Download the Reading Research Literature form (Links to an external site.).
- Watch the video on how to complete this assignment at (Links to an external site.)
- Type answers to the questions directly onto the form. Your form does NOT need to follow APA formatting; however, you are expected to use correct grammar, spelling, syntax, and write in complete sentences.
- Please post questions about this assignment to the Q & A Forum.
- Save the file by clicking Save as and adding your last name, e.g., NR439_W5_Reading_Research_Literature_Form_Smith.docx.
- Submit the completed form by 11:59 p.m. MT Sunday at the end of Week 5.
Rubric
NR439_Reading_Research_Literature
| Criteria | Ratings | Pts | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeVelayutham, et al article: Question 1 Purposeview longer description |
| 10.0 pts | |||||
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 2 Research Questionview longer description |
| 10.0 pts | |||||
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 3 Research Designview longer description |
| 10.0 pts | |||||
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 4 Populationview longer description |
| 10.0 pts | |||||
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 5 Sampleview longer description |
| 10.0 pts | |||||
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 6 Data Collectionview longer description |
| 10.0 pts | |||||
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 7 Data Analysisview longer description |
| 10.0 pts | |||||
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 8 Limitationsview longer description |
| 10.0 pts | |||||
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 9 Conclusionsview longer description |
| 10.0 pts | |||||
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 10 Advances Knowledgeview longer description |
| 10.0 pts | |||||
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePals et al article: Question 11 Purposeview longer description |
| 10.0 pts | |||||
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 12 Research Questionview longer description |
| 10.0 pts | |||||
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 13 Research Designview longer description |
| 10.0 pts | |||||
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 14 Populationview longer description |
| 10.0 pts | |||||
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 15 Sampleview longer description |
| 10.0 pts | |||||
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 16 Data Collectionview longer description |
| 10.0 pts | |||||
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 17 Data Analysisview longer description |
| 10.0 pts | |||||
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 18 Limitationsview longer description |
| 10.0 pts | |||||
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 19 Conclusionsview longer description |
| 10.0 pts | |||||
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 20 Advances Knowledgeview longer description |
| 10.0 pts | |||||
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeStyle and Writingview longer description |
| 25.0 pts | |||||
Total Points: 225.0 | |||||||
Week 5: Homework” aria-describedby=”msf1-previous-desc”>Previous Week 5: Lesson” aria-describedby=”msf1-next-desc”>Next
Expert Solution Preview
Introduction:
As a medical professor, it is essential to introduce medical college students to the research literature and help them understand its purpose, question, design, population, sample, limitations, data collection, and analysis. This assignment is designed to evaluate the student’s ability to read research literature and draw conclusions about its credibility and significance in evidence-based practice.
Answer:
Reading research literature is crucial to understanding the latest advancements in medical practices. The purpose of the Velayutham et al. research article is to investigate quantitative balance and gait in patients with frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer diseases. The research question in this study is, “What are the quantitative balance and gait measurements in patients with frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer diseases?” The research design used in this study is a pilot study. The population in this study includes patients with frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer diseases. The sampling approach used in this study is not explicitly stated. The data collection procedure used in this study collected data using a Wii balance board and a tri-axial accelerometer. The data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics. The limitations of this study include a small sample size, lack of control group, and a non-randomized sampling approach. This study’s conclusions were that quantitative balance and gait measurements may help differentiate patients with frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer diseases. This research advances knowledge in the field by addressing the need to accurately differentiate between the two conditions.
The purpose of the Pals et al. research article is to explore the patient and physician perspectives on a new technology in clinical practice. The research question in this study is, “How do patients and physicians make sense of a new technology in clinical practice?” The research design used in this study is a qualitative study. The population in this study includes patients and physicians. The sampling approach used in this study is purposive sampling. The data collection procedure used in this study collected data using semi-structured interviews. The data were analyzed using thematic analysis. The limitations of this study include a small sample size and possible selection bias in the sampling approach. The conclusions indicate that patient and physician perspectives on new technologies are essential for innovation and successful implementation. This research advances knowledge in the field by providing valuable insights into how patients and physicians perceive new technologies in clinical practice.
