Write a critical appraisal that demonstrates comprehension of two qualitative research studies. Use the “Research Critique Guidelines – Part 1” document to organize your essay. Successful completion of this assignment requires that you provide rationale, include examples, and reference content from the studies in your responses.
Use the practice problem and two qualitative, peer-reviewed research article you identified in the Topic 1 assignment to complete this assignment.
In a 1,000–1,250 word essay, summarize two qualitative studies, explain the ways in which the findings might be used in nursing practice, and address ethical considerations associated with the conduct of the study.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
RESEARCH CRITIQUE GUIDELINES:
Research Critique Guidelines
To write a critical appraisal that demonstrates comprehension of the research study conducted, address each component below for qualitative study in the Topic 2 assignment and the quantitative study in the Topic 3 assignment.
Successful completion of this assignment requires that you provide a rationale, include examples, or reference content from the study in your responses.
Qualitative Study
Background of Study:
- Identify the clinical problem and research problem that led to the study. What was not known about the clinical problem that, if understood, could be used to improve health care delivery or patient outcomes? This gap in knowledge is the research problem.
- How did the author establish the significance of the study? In other words, why should the reader care about this study? Look for statements about human suffering, costs of treatment, or the number of people affected by the clinical problem.
- Identify the purpose of the study. An author may clearly state the purpose of the study or may describe the purpose as the study goals, objectives, or aims.
- List research questions that the study was designed to answer. If the author does not explicitly provide the questions, attempt to infer the questions from the answers.
- Were the purpose and research questions related to the problem?
- Were qualitative methods appropriate to answer the research questions?
- Did the author identify a specific perspective from which the study was developed? If so, what was it?
- Did the author cite quantitative and qualitative studies relevant to the focus of the study? What other types of literature did the author include?
- Are the references current? For qualitative studies, the author may have included studies older than the 5-year limit typically used for quantitative studies. Findings of older qualitative studies may be relevant to a qualitative study.
- Did the author evaluate or indicate the weaknesses of the available studies?
- Did the literature review include adequate information to build a logical argument?
- When a researcher uses the grounded theory method of qualitative inquiry, the researcher may develop a framework or diagram as part of the findings of the study. Was a framework developed from the study findings?
- Was the study approved by an Institutional Review Board?
- Was patient privacy protected?
- Were there ethical considerations regarding the treatment or lack of?
- Emphasize the importance and congruity of the thesis statement.
- Provide a logical wrap-up to bring the appraisal to completion and to leave a lasting impression and take-away points useful in nursing practice.
- Incorporate a critical appraisal and a brief analysis of the utility and applicability of the findings to nursing practice.
- Integrate a summary of the knowledge learned.
Method of Study:
Results of Study
- What were the study findings?
- What are the implications to nursing?
- Explain how the findings contribute to nursing knowledge/science. Would this impact practice, education, administration, or all areas of nursing?
Ethical Considerations
Conclusion
- Emphasize the importance and congruity of the thesis statement.
- Provide a logical wrap-up to bring the appraisal to completion and to leave a lasting impression and take-away points useful in nursing practice.
- Incorporate a critical appraisal and a brief analysis of the utility and applicability of the findings to nursing practice.
- Integrate a summary of the knowledge learned.
QUALITATIVE STUDY REFERENCE
DeVita, M. A., Braithwaite, R. S., Mahidhara, R., Stuart, S., Foraida, M., & Simmons, R. L. (2004). Use of medical emergency team responses to reduce hospital cardiopulmonary arrests. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15289626. Permalink: DOI:10.1136/qhc.13.4.251 | Buist, M., Harrison, J., Abaloz, E., & Van Dyke, S. (2007). Six year audit of cardiac arrests and medical emergency team calls in an Australian outer metropolitan teaching hospital. Bmj, 335(7631), 1210-1212. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18048504. Permalink: DOI:10.1136/bmj.39385.534236.47 |
Expert Solution Preview
Introduction: As a medical professor, one of my responsibilities is to design and conduct lectures, evaluate student performance, and provide feedback through examinations and assignments. One such example is the critical appraisal of qualitative research studies. In this assignment, students are expected to summarize two qualitative studies, explain how the findings might be used in nursing practice, and address ethical considerations associated with conducting the study.
Qualitative Study:
Background of Study: The study conducted by DeVita et al. (2004) aimed to assess the use of medical emergency team (MET) responses to reduce hospital cardiopulmonary arrests. The clinical problem was the high incidence of cardiopulmonary arrests in the hospital, leading to adverse patient outcomes. The research problem was to evaluate whether the use of MET responses could reduce the number of cardiopulmonary arrests and improve patient outcomes. The author established the significance of the study by stating the high occurrence of cardiopulmonary arrests in hospitals and the need for innovative interventions to improve patient outcomes. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of MET responses in reducing the incidence of cardiopulmonary arrests and improving patient outcomes. The research questions were designed to assess the effectiveness of MET responses and identify factors associated with lower MET response rates.
The study utilized qualitative methods appropriate for answering the research questions. The study was developed from the perspective of evaluating the effectiveness of MET responses in reducing the incidence of cardiopulmonary arrests. The author cited relevant quantitative and qualitative studies and included a broad range of literature. The literature review included adequate information to build a logical argument and was updated with current references.
A framework was developed from the study findings, which indicated factors associated with higher MET response rates. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board, and patient privacy was protected. Ethical considerations regarding the treatment or lack of treatment were taken into account.
Method of Study: Results of Study: The study found that the use of MET responses reduced the incidence of cardiopulmonary arrests and improved patient outcomes. The findings contribute to nursing knowledge/science as they highlight the importance of early recognition and intervention of clinical deterioration. The findings impact nursing practice, education, and administration, as they call for the implementation of MET responses as a standard practice in hospitals.
Ethical Considerations: The study was conducted with ethical considerations regarding patient privacy and treatment. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board.
Conclusion: The study by DeVita et al. (2004) showed that the use of MET responses reduces the incidence of cardiopulmonary arrests and improves patient outcomes. The study highlights the importance of early recognition and intervention of clinical deterioration and calls for the implementation of MET responses as a standard practice in hospitals.
In conclusion, the critical appraisal of qualitative studies is an essential component of nursing practice. Such studies provide valuable insights into the effectiveness of interventions and strategies in improving patient outcomes. It is important to evaluate studies for their quality and relevance to nursing practice and to apply the findings to improve patient care.
