IMPORTANT NOTE REGARDING WORD LIMIT REQUIREMENTS:
Please note that each and every assignment has its own word limit.
This benchmark assignment assesses the following competency:
5.3: Apply negotiation and mediation skills to address organizational or community challenges.
The purpose of this assignment is to apply negotiation and mediation skills to address an organizational and community challenge.
For a public health professional, the ability to negotiate and mediate during organizational and community challenges is paramount to success. The ability to clearly communicate information and react to challenges by following clear protocols is essential when guiding during a crisis.
Read the “A Case Study of Environmental Injustice: The Failure in Flint” topic material.. Assume the role of a public health leader associated with the Flint case study, and write a 750-1,000 word paper to address the Flint case study. Address each of the following.
- What is the problem to be resolved or decision to be made?
- Who are the key decision makers and leaders? What is motivating each of them?
- To resolve the problem or come to a decision, what questions must be addressed? What issues must be resolved?
- What are the ethical dilemmas associated with the case?
- What are the primary negotiation and mediation skills you would use to address each question and resolve each issue? Justify your selection of each.
- Explain and justify how you would resolve the issue and articulate the decisions you would make in this situation.
General Requirements
You are required to cite at least FIVE sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the discussion question criteria and public health content.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide. An abstract is not required.
While APA style is required, solid academic writing is expected as well, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
PLEASE make sure APA citation and permalink for articles are complete and correct.
PLEASE ANSWER ALL QUESTIONS IN PARAGRAPHS AND MAKE IT COHESIVE AND TRY TO INCORPORATE THE READINGS BELOW
PLEASE add the links/sites below to the reference list if you use any of these readings and make sure everything is in proper APA format.
Read Chapters 12 and 21 in Public Health Leadership: Putting Principles Into Practice.
URL:
Read “A Case Study of Environmental Injustice: The Failure in Flint,” by Campbell, Greenberg, Mankikar, and Ross, from International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (2016).
URL:
View “Servant Leadership: How a Jar Can Change the Way You Lead and Serve,” by TedX Talks (2017), located on the YouTube website.
URL:
Read “Seeking and Measuring the Essential Behaviors of Servant Leadership,” by Winston and Fields, from Leadership and Organization Development Journal (2015), located on the Emerald Insight website.
URL:
View “Trending Faith: Why Worry About Ethics,” by Grand Canyon University (2015), located on YouTube website.
URL:
Read “Section 8. Ethical Leadership” of Chapter 13 of Leadership and Management, located on the Community Toolbox website.
URL:
Read “Principles of the Ethical Practice of Public Health,” by the Public Health Leadership Society (2002), located on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) website.
URL:
MUST haveat least 5 citations with the page numbers and 5 references in APA format.(The List of References should not be older than 2016 and should not be included in the word count.) Include at least one scholarly reference and appropriate in-text citations and Address all points on the DQ. One point will be deducted for not addressing each item mentioned above. Remember that presenting someone else’s work as your own is plagiarism.
Be sure to support your postings and responses with specific references to the Learning Resources.
It is important that you cover all the topics identified in the assignment. Covering the topic does not mean mentioning the topic BUT presenting an explanation from the context of ethics and the readings for this class
I am a stickler for good organization in everything. I do not want to have to dig for your answers. For instance, if an assignment asks you to provide three examples of something, I suggest that you number them 1-3 so I can find them easily. I also expect that when you submit something as a narrative, you pay attention to how you organize your thoughts: use paragraphs with a topic sentence and supporting sentences; and change paragraphs whenever you introduce a new idea. Also, if there are multiple parts to an assignment, use sub-heads within the paper to organize them.
To get maximum points you need to follow the requirements listed for this assignments 1) look at the word/page limits 2) review and follow APA rules 3) create subheadings to identify the key sections you are presenting and 4) Free from typographical and sentence construction errors.
REMEMBER IN APA FORMAT JOURNAL TITLES AND VOLUME NUMBERS ARE ITALICIZED.
References
American Psychological Association. (2020). Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (7th Ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
Expert Solution Preview
Introduction:
This paper aims to address the Flint case study by assuming the role of a public health leader associated with the case study. The following questions will be addressed in this paper: What is the problem to be resolved or decision to be made? Who are the key decision makers and leaders? What is motivating each of them? To resolve the problem or come to a decision, what questions must be addressed? What issues must be resolved? What are the ethical dilemmas associated with the case? What are the primary negotiation and mediation skills you would use to address each question and resolve each issue? Justify your selection of each. Explain and justify how you would resolve the issue and articulate the decisions you would make in this situation.
Answer:
Flint, a city in Michigan, encountered a significant drinking water crisis in 2014 when the decision was made to switch from Detroit’s municipal water system to the Flint River to save money. The problem that needs to be resolved is the safety and accessibility of drinking water for the residents of Flint. The water from the river was more corrosive, and the city failed to use corrosion control measures. As a result, lead from old pipes leached into the water, putting thousands of Flint residents at risk of lead poisoning.
The primary decision-makers and leaders to address this issue are the city officials, including former Mayor Dayne Walling, former Michigan Department of Environmental Quality Director Dan Wyant, and former Governor Rick Snyder, who oversaw emergency management efforts. Each of them was motivated by different factors. For example, Walling, who was running for reelection, wanted to save money to balance the city’s budget. Wyant wanted to demonstrate that Michigan could regulate its own water systems while Snyder was motivated by cost-cutting measures.
To resolve the problem and make decisions, several questions must be addressed. These include: How can we ensure access to safe drinking water for Flint residents? What measures need to be taken to restore trust in the government and public health institutions? How can we prevent similar disasters from happening in other cities?
The ethical dilemmas associated with the case include the failure of public health officials to notify the public about the dangers of lead in the water, the delay in switching back to the Detroit water system, and the lack of urgency in responding to the crisis. Furthermore, the decision to switch to the Flint River without proper consultation with experts and community members, primarily composed of African Americans and Latinos, was a failure in environmental justice.
To address each question and resolve each issue, primary negotiation, and mediation skills include active listening and empathy, framing the crisis in terms of the shared value of public health, and creating a collaborative decision-making process stakeholders and community members. Active listening and empathy can help involve community members in decision-making, recognizing their concerns and experiences. Notwithstanding, framing the crisis in terms of the shared value of public health can engage everyone in the common goal of providing safe drinking water, while a collaborative decision-making process can build trust between residents and officials.
To resolve the issue, the government should acknowledge its responsibility for the crisis by compensating for damages, enacting measures to ensure the safe drinking water of the residents, and prevent further disasters. Additionally, public health officials should communicate transparent and clear information to the public, ensuring that the government has learned from its mistakes. Furthermore, public health officials should incorporate environmental justice principles into decision-making and consider the marginalized communities’ voices and experiences.
