For this Discussion, you will first consider sampling strategies. Then, you will turn your attention to data collection methods, including their strengths, limitations, and ethical implications. Last, you will consider measurement reliability and validity in the context of your discipline. Post a restatement of your assigned position on sampling strategies. Defend your position with examples and support from the scholarly literature. Next, select a data collection method and briefly explain its strengths and limitations. Then, identify a potential ethical issue with this method and describe a strategy to address it. Last, explain the relationship between measurement reliability and measurement validity using an example from your discipline.Specific methods of data collection (e.g., surveys, interviews, observations) produce specific types of data that will answer particular research questions, but not others; so here too, as covered in previous weeks, the research questions inform how the data will be obtained. Furthermore, the method used to collect the data may impact the reliability and the validity of that data.
Position A: Probability sampling represents the best strategy for selecting research participants.
Expert Solution Preview
Introduction:
Sampling strategies and data collection methods are crucial aspects of medical research that impact the reliability and validity of the data. As a medical professor, I believe that understanding these concepts is essential for medical college students. In this discussion, I will defend my position on sampling strategies, explain the strengths and limitations of a data collection method, identify potential ethical issues and suggest strategies to address them, and provide an example of the relationship between measurement reliability and validity in the medical discipline.
Answer:
Position A: Probability sampling represents the best strategy for selecting research participants.
I agree with this position as probability sampling is a systematic approach that ensures representation of the population. It is fair, objective, and involves random selection. This method eliminates bias in research and makes generalization possible based on the sample size. For instance, a study on the prevalence of diabetes in a population may randomly select participants from different socio-economic backgrounds and ages to achieve diversity and validity of results.
Moreover, probability sampling methods include simple random sampling, stratified random sampling, and cluster sampling, which are effective in reducing sampling errors. According to Rosenthal and Rosnow (2008), probability sampling increases the chances of obtaining a representative sample that can be generalized to the population.
In contrast, non-probability sampling methods, such as snowball or convenience sampling, may introduce bias into the research results. These methods only involve easily accessible participants or referrals, which may limit the diversity of research participants and the generalizability of findings.
In conclusion, probability sampling is the best strategy for selecting research participants as it ensures representation of the population, reduces bias, and increases the validity and generalizability of the research results.
Secondly, I will discuss the strengths and limitations of the survey method as a data collection method. Surveys are a commonly used method that collects data through questionnaires or interviews, and it is effective in obtaining large amounts of data in a short time. The strength of survey method is that it is cost-effective and less time-consuming.
However, surveys have limitations as they rely on self-reported data, which may be subject to social desirability bias or inaccurate responses. Participants may also not respond to all questions, leading to missing data. Moreover, surveys require proper planning to ensure that the questions are clear, unambiguous, and relevant to the research questions. Otherwise, they may not provide accurate data.
An ethical issue associated with surveys is ensuring informed consent, privacy, and confidentiality. Participants must be informed about their rights and the purpose of the survey and have the right to withdraw from the study at any time. To address these issues, researchers can provide a clear explanation of the purpose of the survey, ensure anonymity of participants, and obtain written consent before administering the survey.
Lastly, I will provide an example of the relationship between measurement reliability and validity in the medical discipline. For instance, in measuring patient satisfaction with healthcare services, reliability is crucial to ensure that the results are consistent and stable over time and across different raters. Validity, on the other hand, ensures that the results measure what they are intended to measure. The use of a validated and reliable instrument in measuring patient satisfaction with healthcare services ensures that the results are dependable, consistent, and accurate.
In conclusion, understanding sampling strategies, data collection methods, and measurement reliability and validity is fundamental to conducting medical research. Probability sampling is the best strategy for selecting research participants as it reduces bias and increases the validity and generalizability of the research results. Surveys have strengths and limitations and require proper planning to ensure the accuracy of data and address ethical issues. Finally, reliability and validity are necessary in medical research to ensure the accuracy, consistency, and stability of the research results.
