Please, read carefully each topic and answer the topic individually with no plagiarism or from other sources such as course hero, etc. Thank you. Also, make sure to read “The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks book” Citation is:
Skloot, R. (2011). The immortal life of Henrietta Lacks. New York: Broadway Paperbacks.
Due Thursday (20 pts)
Read “Thirteen Ways of Looking at Henrietta Lacks”from Perspectives in Biology and Medicine.
Write a 175- to 265-word response to the following:
- Select two points that the author makes that you may agree or disagree with and explain why.
During Skloot and Deborah’s meeting with Christoph Lengauer, Lengauer emphasizes the importance of Henrietta Lacks’s contribution to science and how she is remembered in the medical community. Langauer states, “Whenever we read books about science, it’s always HeLa this and HeLa that. Some people know those are the initials of a person, but they don’t know who that person is. That’s important history.”
Writea 525- to 700-word article that addresses the following:
- Evaluate whether the book effectively illustrates the significance of Henrietta Lacks’s life, her contributions to science, and their impact on her family. Answer the following questions in your evaluation:
- Are there problematic elements as to how Skloot portrays Lacks and her family?
- Do you agree with Lengauer’s quote that it is important to know about Henrietta Lacks? Why or why not?
- Explain how learning about Henrietta Lacks’s story helped you become a more ethical leader.
- Provide 2 to 3 examples of what medical professionals can do to prevent unethical practices.
Use3 examples from the book to support your response and cite the novel.
Publishthe article on your own social media account (e.g., LinkedIn, Facebook, etc.), or post it on a health care message board of your choice.
Includea citation of your article in your assignment.
Read Maryland Health Care Provider Sentenced to 10 years in Federal Prison for Health Care Fraud Resulting in Patient Deathsfrom the United States Attorney’s Office.
Use the 5 Whys to conduct a root cause analysis to determine why the Medicare fraud occurred and Timothy Emeigh’s participation in the case.
Write a 525- to 700-word paper that identifies and evaluatesthe root cause for Medicare fraud in this case.
- List each of the 5 Whys and your response.
- Speculate as to why Mr. Emeigh participated in the scheme.
- Explain what you might have done to prevent this from happening.
Cite3 reputable references to support your assignment (e.g., trade or industry publications, government or agency websites, scholarly works, or other sources of similar quality).
Formatyour assignment according to APA guidelines.
PLEASE MAKE THE TOPICS SEPARATELY IN EACH PAGE
Expert Solution Preview
In “Thirteen Ways of Looking at Henrietta Lacks,” the author makes several points about the life and legacy of Henrietta Lacks. Two of these points that I agree with are the significance of HeLa cells in medical research and the importance of recognizing the contributions of Lacks and her family. HeLa cells have played a crucial role in many scientific breakthroughs, and their impact cannot be denied. However, the way these cells were obtained and used, without informed consent from Lacks or her family, highlights ethical concerns in medical research. It is important to acknowledge this and work towards creating ethical guidelines for human tissue research.
Additionally, the author emphasizes the significance of Lacks and her family’s story in highlighting the injustices and mistreatment that marginalized communities have faced in healthcare and medical research. The fact that Lacks and her family were not consulted or compensated for their contributions to science is a reflection of systemic inequalities in healthcare. Acknowledging and correcting these injustices is necessary to move towards a more equitable healthcare system.
“The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks” provides an insightful and eye-opening account of Henrietta Lacks’s life, the contributions she unknowingly made to science, and the impact on her family. The book effectively illustrates the significance of Lacks’s life, her contributions to science, and their impact on her family. However, there are certain problematic elements in how Skloot portrays Lacks and her family. For instance, the book focuses largely on Skloot’s journey to uncover Lacks’s story, which can overshadow Lacks’s own experiences. Additionally, at times, Skloot’s interactions with the family come across as exploitative rather than respectful.
I agree with Lengauer’s quote that it is important to know about Henrietta Lacks. Her story highlights the ethical concerns and injustices in medical research and healthcare. Learning about Lacks’s story can help create awareness and push for change towards a more equitable healthcare system.
Learning about Henrietta Lacks’s story has helped me become a more ethical leader by highlighting the importance of informed consent in medical research and the need for transparency and accountability. Medical professionals can prevent unethical practices by prioritizing patient autonomy and informed consent, ensuring equitable access to healthcare, and regularly evaluating and improving ethical guidelines.
The Medicare fraud that resulted in patient deaths and Timothy Emeigh’s participation in the case can be analyzed using the 5 Whys. The following is a root cause analysis that identifies and evaluates the factors that contributed to the fraud:
Why did the Maryland Health Care Provider submit false Medicare claims?
Because they wanted to increase profits and maintain their financial stability.
Why did the Provider feel the need to increase profits?
Because of the financial pressure on the healthcare system and the Provider’s desire to remain competitive.
Why did the financial pressure exist?
Because of the complexity of the healthcare reimbursement system and the lack of government oversight.
Why did the government fail to provide adequate oversight?
Because of a lack of resources and political will to allocate sufficient funding towards regulating healthcare.
Why was funding not prioritized towards healthcare regulation?
Because of competing budget priorities and a lack of understanding of the importance and long-term benefits of adequate regulation.
Mr. Emeigh might have participated in the scheme to either benefit financially or to support the Provider’s goals of maintaining financial stability and competitive edge.
To prevent similar incidents, healthcare professionals can prioritize transparency and accountability, implement adequate regulations and oversight, and prioritize patient care rather than financial gain. Government agencies can also provide sufficient resources and allocate funding towards healthcare regulation and enforcement to ensure the safety and well-being of patients.