Please answer the following questions.
1). Why is the Darling case described as a benchmark case?
2). What, if any, sanctions should be imposed upon an on-call physician who fails to respond to such a call when requested?
3). Describe two malpractice risks for surgeons.
4). Briefly describe how practicing effective communication skills may help prevent a medical malpractice lawsuit.
Expert Solution Preview
Introduction:
As a medical professor, it is important to educate college students on important cases, ethical standards, and potential risks in the medical field. In this assignment, we will examine the Darling case, discuss sanctions for on-call physicians who fail to respond, identify malpractice risks for surgeons, and explore the role of effective communication skills in preventing malpractice lawsuits.
1) The Darling case is described as a benchmark case because it established a legal precedent for informed consent. In this case, a patient underwent surgery without being informed of the risks involved. The court ruled that physicians have a duty to fully inform patients of the risks and benefits of treatment, and failure to do so can result in legal action.
2) An on-call physician who fails to respond to a call may face sanctions from their employer, medical board, or licensing organization. Depending on the severity of the situation, the physician may face disciplinary action, suspension, or loss of license.
3) Surgeons face a variety of malpractice risks, including surgical errors, complications during surgery, and failure to properly inform patients of the risks involved. Additionally, surgeons may face legal action if they perform a procedure outside of their area of expertise or if they fail to follow proper medical protocols.
4) Practicing effective communication skills can help prevent medical malpractice lawsuits by ensuring that patients fully understand the risks and benefits of treatment. Doctors who take the time to explain medical procedures, potential complications, and treatment options in language patients can understand can reduce the likelihood of misunderstandings and miscommunication. Additionally, listening actively to patients’ concerns and providing compassionate care can help prevent legal action.