IMPORTANT NOTE REGARDING WORD LIMIT REQUIREMENTS:
undefined
Please note that each and every assignment has its own word limit.
undefined
The purpose of a policy analysis is to provide advice to a decision maker regarding a specific course of action on a public policy decision. For this assignment, conduct a critical analysis of an existing policy of your choice, either at the local, state, or federal level. Develop a short, written policy analysis (750 to 1,250 words) related to a public health issue of your choice. Refer to the resource “Guidelines for Preparing a Brief Policy Analysis” when preparing this assignment and include the following in the policy analysis:
undefined
- Problem Statement: A problem statement should be clear, concise, and written in the form of a question that identifies the public health problem addressed in the analysis. The problem statement should be one or two sentences maximum.
- Background of the Problem: This section should include factual information and evidence necessary to understand the public health problem, describe why the public health problem is important, and explain why the issue needs attention.
- Landscape of the Problem: Key Stakeholders: This section should identify the specific key stakeholders relevant to the policy analysis.
- Landscape of the Problem: Key Factors: This section provides the overall context of the issue and should include epidemiological, political, economic, practical/feasibility, legal, and ethical factors.
- Available Options for Action: This section should provide an analysis of three to five options for a policy course of action, including the benefits and drawbacks of each course of action. Discuss the evidence and ethical implications of each of the options.
- Recommendation: This section should describe one of the previously described options as the recommendation. Clearly identify which option is being recommended and why it was selected over the other options. Describe why it is the best option despite potential drawbacks, and address ways to reduce negative aspects of the recommendation. Describe the potential this policy recommendation could have for public health or health equity.
undefined
Incorporate at least six scholarly sources into your presentation of the health policy analysis.
undefined
undefined
General Requirements
undefined
You are required to cite at least SIX sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the discussion question criteria and public health content.
undefined
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide. An abstract is not required.
undefined
While APA style is required, solid academic writing is expected as well, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines.
undefined
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
undefined
undefined
PLEASE make sure APA citation and permalink for articles are complete and correct.
undefined
undefined
undefined
PLEASE add the links/sites below to the reference list if you use any of these readings and make sure everything is in proper APA format.
undefined
undefined
Read Chapter 7 in Essentials of Health Policy and Law. Review Chapter 6.
undefined
URL:
undefined
undefined
Read “Nine Questions to Guide Development and Implementation of Health in All Policies,” by De Leeuw and Peters, from Health Promotion International (2015).
undefined
URL:
undefined
Read “Does Stigmatized Social Risk Lead to Denialism? Results From a Survey Experiment on Race, Risk Perception, and Health Policy in the United States,” by Dunham, Lieberman, and Snell, from Plos ONE (2016).
undefined
Read “Collaborating for Health: Health in All Policies and the Law,” by Pepin, Winig, Carr, and Jacobson, from Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics (2017).
Read “The Health in All Policies (HiAP) Approach and the Law: Preliminary Lessons from California and Chicago,” by Polsky, Stagg, Gakh, and Bozlak, from Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics (2015).
Read “The GREENH-City Interventional Research Protocol on Health in All Policies,” by Porcherie et al., from BMC Public Health (2017).
Read “The Eighth Global Conference on Health Promotion: Health in All Policies: From Rhetoric to Action,” by Tang, Stahl, Bettcher, and De Leeuw, from Health Promotion International (2014).
Read Health in All Polices: Experiences from Local Health Departments, by the National Association of County and City Health Officials (NACCHO) (2017), located on the NACCHO website.
Read “Addressing the Social Determinants of Health Through Medicaid Managed Care,” located on The Commonwealth Fund website.
URL:
Download and read Health in All Policies Training Manual, available on the World Health Organization (WHO) website.
URL:
Explore the Health in All Policies page of the American Public Health Association (APHA) website.
MUST have at least 5 citations with the page numbers and 5 references in APA format. (The List of References should not be older than 2017 and should not be included in the word count.) Include at least one scholarly reference and appropriate in-text citations and Address all points on the DQ. One point will be deducted for not addressing each item mentioned above. Remember that presenting someone else’s work as your own is plagiarism.
Be sure to support your postings and responses with specific references to the Learning Resources.
It is important that you cover all the topics identified in the assignment. Covering the topic does not mean mentioning the topic BUT presenting an explanation from the context of ethics and the readings for this class
I am a stickler for good organization in everything. I do not want to have to dig for your answers. For instance, if an assignment asks you to provide three examples of something, I suggest that you number them 1-3 so I can find them easily. I also expect that when you submit something as a narrative, you pay attention to how you organize your thoughts: use paragraphs with a topic sentence and supporting sentences; and change paragraphs whenever you introduce a new idea. Also, if there are multiple parts to an assignment, use sub-heads within the paper to organize them.
To get maximum points you need to follow the requirements listed for this assignments 1) look at the word/page limits 2) review and follow APA rules 3) create subheadings to identify the key sections you are presenting and 4) Free from typographical and sentence construction errors.
REMEMBER IN APA FORMAT JOURNAL TITLES AND VOLUME NUMBERS ARE ITALICIZED.
References
American Psychological Association. Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (7th Ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
Expert Solution Preview
Introduction:
As a medical professor, one of my responsibilities is designing and conducting lectures, evaluating student performance, and providing feedback through examinations and assignments. For this assignment, I will conduct a critical analysis of an existing policy related to a public health issue. The purpose of this policy analysis is to provide advice to a decision-maker regarding a specific course of action on a public policy decision.
Problem Statement:
What is the best course of action for improving access to quality healthcare for underserved communities?
Background of the Problem:
Access to quality healthcare is a significant public health issue in underserved communities. These communities face various barriers, such as lack of insurance, high costs, and provider shortages, that hinder their ability to access and receive adequate healthcare. This issue is essential because it has adverse effects on the health and well-being of these communities. Chronic conditions, such as diabetes and heart disease, are often left untreated, leading to poor health outcomes and increased healthcare costs.
Landscape of the Problem: Key Stakeholders:
The key stakeholders relevant to this policy analysis include healthcare providers, policymakers, public health officials, community-based organizations, and patients.
Landscape of the Problem: Key Factors:
The landscape of the problem involves various epidemiological, political, economic, practical/feasibility, legal, and ethical factors. The epidemiological factors include the prevalence of chronic diseases, access to preventive services, and the impact of social determinants of health. The political factors include the influence of healthcare interest groups, policy priorities, and healthcare reform efforts. The economic factors include ever-increasing healthcare costs and the availability of funding for healthcare programs. The practical/feasibility factors include the ability to implement healthcare programs in underserved communities. The legal factors involve the compliance with federal and state laws related to healthcare, while the ethical factors involve ensuring equitable access to healthcare.
Available Options for Action:
Option 1: Expand Medicaid eligibility to cover more individuals in underserved communities
Benefits: This option would increase access to insurance and enable more individuals to receive preventive and ongoing healthcare services.
Drawbacks: This option would require additional funding, and expanding a state’s Medicaid program can be politically controversial.
Evidence: States that have expanded Medicaid eligibility have seen significant improvements in access to healthcare among low-income adults.
Option 2: Increase funding for Community Health Centers
Benefits: This option would increase access to primary care services, reduce healthcare costs, and improve health outcomes in underserved communities.
Drawbacks: This option would require additional funding, and implementation can be challenging, particularly in rural areas.
Evidence: A study by the Commonwealth Fund found that Community Health Centers provide high-quality healthcare services to underserved communities and are cost-effective.
Option 3: Implement Telehealth Programs
Benefits: This option would increase access to care in rural and remote communities, enable remote monitoring of chronic conditions, and reduce healthcare costs.
Drawbacks: This option requires significant investment in technology and infrastructure and has challenges related to reimbursement and licensure.
Evidence: The use of telehealth programs has been found to improve access to healthcare services in underserved communities.
Recommendation:
Option 2: Increase funding for Community Health Centers is the best recommendation for improving access to quality healthcare for underserved communities. While expanding Medicaid and implementing telehealth programs are viable options, funding Community Health Centers would provide the necessary infrastructure to address the root causes of health disparities and have a more significant impact on health outcomes. Despite the potential drawbacks of additional costs and implementation challenges, this option offers a sustainable and community-based approach to improving access to healthcare.
Conclusion:
Improving access to quality healthcare in underserved communities should be a public health priority. By expanding Medicaid, increasing funding for Community Health Centers, and implementing telehealth programs, policymakers can address the root causes of health disparities and improve the health and well-being of underserved communities. The best option for addressing this public health issue is to increase funding for Community Health Centers, which will provide the necessary infrastructure to improve access to healthcare for these communities.
