prepare a written document response to a case study that applies the steps of ethical reasoning to a medical challenge. Please follow the instructions below and prepare your document. Be sure to save in .doc or .docx format, and to follow APA guidelines.
For more guidance about APA formatting, please visit the APA Resources folder in the Student Resources course menu tab.
*To view the grading rubric for this discussion, click the name of the discussion, then click “Grading Information”
Instructions:
In Module 5, we detailed the steps of ethical reasoning.
Review the Euthanasia case study. Module 5 Case Study Euthanasia.pdf Module 5 Case Study Euthanasia.pdf – Alternative Formats
Apply the steps of ethical reasoning and analysis and develop a recommendation for the medical ethics issue presented.
What is your opinion on taking a human rights approach to the issue of euthanasia?
Please include your response to the questions at the end of the case study in your recommendation.
How to solve
Indiana Institute of Technology Module 5 Medical Ethics Problem of Euthanasia Analysis
Euthanasia is a complex medical ethics issue that requires careful consideration and application of ethical reasoning. In the given case study, we are presented with a scenario where a patient, Mr. Roberts, is suffering from a debilitating and extremely painful medical condition. He has expressed his desire for euthanasia as a means to end his suffering. As medical professionals, it is our responsibility to critically analyze this situation using the steps of ethical reasoning to develop an informed recommendation.
The first step in ethical reasoning is to gather relevant information. In this case, we need to consider Mr. Roberts’ medical condition, his prognosis, the level of pain and suffering he is experiencing, and any potential treatments or interventions available. It is crucial to understand the full context of his situation before making any ethical judgments.
The second step involves identifying the ethical issues involved. In this case, the primary ethical issue is the right to autonomy and self-determination of the patient. Mr. Roberts has clearly expressed his desire for euthanasia, indicating that he values quality of life over the continued suffering caused by his medical condition. On the other hand, there may be conflicting ethical principles such as the sanctity of life and the duty of healthcare professionals to preserve life.
The third step in ethical reasoning is to consider alternative options and evaluate their potential consequences. In this case, we might explore alternative treatments or interventions that could alleviate Mr. Roberts’ pain and suffering without resorting to euthanasia. It is important to weigh the potential benefits and harms of these alternatives and assess their feasibility in Mr. Roberts’ specific case.
The fourth step involves making a decision or recommendation based on the previous steps. In this case, my recommendation would be to respect Mr. Roberts’ autonomous decision and honor his request for euthanasia. While the sanctity of life is an important ethical principle, it should not override an individual’s autonomy and right to die with dignity. It is essential to ensure that appropriate safeguards and legal protocols are followed to prevent abuse and protect vulnerable individuals.
Regarding the question of taking a human rights approach to the issue of euthanasia, my opinion is that it can provide a useful framework for understanding and addressing this complex issue. Recognizing euthanasia as a matter of individual rights allows us to focus on the individual’s autonomy and the right to make decisions about their own life and death. However, it is essential to consider the potential social and ethical implications, and to develop comprehensive regulations and guidelines that balance individual rights with societal interests.
In conclusion, the case of Mr. Roberts presents a challenging ethical dilemma in the field of medical ethics. Applying the steps of ethical reasoning, it is important to gather relevant information, identify the ethical issues, consider alternative options, and make a decision or recommendation based on a comprehensive evaluation. In this case, my recommendation would be to respect Mr. Roberts’ autonomous decision and honor his request for euthanasia, while ensuring appropriate safeguards are in place. Taking a human rights approach can provide a helpful perspective in understanding and addressing euthanasia as an issue of individual autonomy and dignity.
