i was assigned to do Debate Team 1 – Qualitative is more effective
Quantitative vs. Qualitative Debate
Your instructor will divide the class into two groups: Debate Team 1 and Debate Team 2. Please make sure you place your original post and response posts in the appropriate area. You will debate the values of the two main types of research as follows:
- Debate Team 1 – Qualitative is more effective
Debate Team 1 –Present an argument in a substantial initial post that qualitative research is a better method than quantitative research in health information management or health informatics. Use at least three scholarly sources, one of which can be the textbook, to provide evidence that supports this argument. (Hint: it may be helpful to find qualitative studies in the field of health to prove your point)
- Debate Team 1 Responses to Team 2: Post a rebuttal against two of your classmates who were on Team 2. Read through your peers’ posts and then refute two of your classmates’ arguments that Qualitative Research is more effective than Quantitative research.
Debate Team 2 – Present an argument in a substantial post that quantitative research is a more effective method than qualitative research in health information management or health informatics. Use at least three scholarly sources, one of which can be the textbook, in providing evidence that supports this argument. (Hint: it may be helpful to find quantitative studies in the field of health to prove your point)
- Debate Team 2 Responses to Team 1: Post a rebuttal against two of your classmates who were on Team 1. Read through the posts and then refute two of your classmates’ arguments stating that Quantitative Research is more effective than Qualitative research.
NOTE: To start, craft your initial argument in support of the side you have been assigned. This post must be a minimum of 300 words. Remember, your post must analyze how either quantitative or qualitative research is more effective than the other. Even if you do not personally agree with the side that has been assigned to you, you must still present a convincing argument that upholds that side in your initial post and your responses. Then, respond to at least two of your classmates’ posts who were assigned the opposite side of the debate. Your responses to your classmates should present a counterargument, where as a supporter of your assigned side, you give reasons for why you disagree with them based on pertinent information. You are strongly encouraged to review this week’s recommended reading and to research on your own to identify other sources to support your argument.
Your initial post must include:
- A succinct thesis statement that demonstrates your stance on the topic.
- A clear explanation for your rationale and examples to support your view.
- A minimum of three scholarly, peer-reviewed sources. One of these sources may be from the course Required and/or Recommended Resources, and at least one must be obtained through the University of Arizona Global Campus Library.
Each response to a classmate must be unique and should include:
- A succinct statement of your thesis regarding why you disagree with their stance on the issue.
- A clear response that explains your rationale for your opposing stance and examples to support your view.
- A minimum of two scholarly, peer-reviewed sources. One of these sources may be from the course Required and/or Recommended Resources, and at least one must be obtained through the University of Arizona Global Campus Library.
Expert Solution Preview
Introduction:
Research is a crucial aspect in the field of health information management or health informatics. There are two primary types of research: qualitative and quantitative. Qualitative research is a method that involves the collection and analysis of non-numerical data, while quantitative research involves the collection and analysis of numerical data to identify patterns and trends. In this discussion, we will debate which research method is more effective, with Debate Team 1 arguing that qualitative research is more effective than quantitative research.
Argument for Qualitative Research:
Qualitative research is a more effective research method in health information management or health informatics. Unlike quantitative research that focuses on numerical data only, qualitative research provides a thorough understanding of the subject matter while considering the perceptions and feelings of people involved. Qualitative research uses methods such as interviews, observations, and case studies to collect data, which presents a complete and in-depth analysis of the subject matter. Additionally, qualitative research allows researchers to identify specific areas that require further investigation, which helps in improving health information management and health informatics.
Supporting Evidence:
First, qualitative research empowers researchers to collect data that is more detailed and nuanced than quantitative data. It allows for the collection of data from individuals or groups based on their experiences, opinions, and perspectives, giving a more comprehensive understanding of the problem under study. For example, qualitative research can be used to assess the quality of health care services rendered to patients, identifying their experiences with the healthcare service providers.
Second, Qualitative research emphasizes the natural phenomenon and provides the researcher with the freedom to explore various perspectives without being bounded to a specific hypothesis. Unlike quantitative research that seeks to prove hypotheses, qualitative research focuses on exploring the lived experiences of people to understand various phenomena. This approach enables researchers to identify previously unknown problems and information that would have otherwise been missed with quantitative research.
Third, qualitative research can be used to understand the effectiveness of health information management and health informatics. For example, qualitative research can be used to collect feedback on the effectiveness of electronic health records (EHRs) that are used in health organizations.
Rebuttal to Debate Team 2:
Debate Team 1 disagrees with Debate Team 2 that quantitative research is more effective than qualitative research. While quantitative research is crucial in analyzing numbers and identifying trends, it falls short in evaluating the perceptions and experiences of people. Unlike quantitative research, qualitative research provides researchers with the freedom to explore different perspectives, which presents a more nuanced understanding of the matter under consideration. Additionally, qualitative research empowers researchers to identify previously unknown problems and gather data that would have been missed using a quantitative research approach.
