Review the Real-World Critical Thinking Scenario.
Write a 350- to 700-word reflection on the scenario, using the Reflection Template. Follow the instructions within the template to complete your reflection. You will need to include an introduction paragraph to introduce your reader to the topics you will be discussing; 3 body paragraphs, each with specific questions that need to be addressed within; and a conclusion paragraph to bring your paper to a close.
Note: The Reflection Template is already formatted appropriately, and you do not need to make any changes to the format. The questions to help you write the 3 paragraphs are contained in the template. Be sure to demonstrate your critical thinking abilities in your responses to the questions and ensure your paper flows well from topic to topic.
Expert Solution Preview
Introduction:
The Real-World Critical Thinking Scenario involves a young man who is experiencing extreme pain in his abdomen and requires immediate medical attention. The scenario presents several ethical dilemmas that medical professionals may encounter in their day-to-day practice. This reflection uses the Reflection Template to analyze the scenario and explore the different aspects of medical ethical practice.
Body Paragraph 1:
The first question that needs to be addressed is, “What are the problems presented in this scenario?” The scenario highlights numerous problems associated with medical ethical practice, including the dilemmas faced by medical practitioners when dealing with patients who require immediate medical attention. The situation creates a conflict between the duty of medical professionals to save lives and the ethical obligation to obtain informed consent from patients before initiating treatment. Medical professionals in such scenarios have to make critical decisions within a short period, with the only objective of saving the patient’s life.
Body Paragraph 2:
The second question that needs to be addressed is, “What are the potential consequences of the problems identified?” The consequences associated with the dilemmas highlighted in the scenario can have far-reaching implications. Medical practitioners who neglect to obtain informed consent may face numerous lawsuits, which could lead to the loss of their licenses and reputation. Moreover, the patient’s family could sue the medical professional, leading to a negative impact on their professional reputation and public opinion.
Body Paragraph 3:
The third question that needs to be addressed is, “What are the possible solutions to the identified problems, and what are their advantages and disadvantages?” Possible solutions to the challenges highlighted in the scenario could include obtaining informed consent from the patient, even if it means delaying medical attention. Alternatively, medical professionals could obtain informal consent from the patient’s family or guardians in scenarios where the patient is incapacitated. However, both of these strategies have their disadvantages, which could lead to harm or negative consequences for both the patient and the medical professional.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, the real-world scenario highlighted numerous ethical dilemmas associated with medical practice, requiring practitioners to make critical decisions that could impact their professional reputation and the lives of their patients. The Reflection Template provided a framework for analyzing the scenario and exploring possible solutions to the problems presented. However, medical professionals must make conscious decisions, weighing the consequences and advantages of each option before taking action.