Module 03 Assignment – Health Resources for Substance Abuse
Module 03 Content
Healthcare injustice is an unfortunate common occurrence throughout the United States. Many communities do not have access or proper funding to receive adequate and equal health care compared to others. This leads to poorer health conditions, increases in substance abuse and addiction, and a decrease in life expectancy. In this assignment, you will identify a specific geographical location in which health resources, specifically substance abuse, are limited and a need for proper healthcare is warranted.
While working as the Substance Abuse Director for your state’s health department, you are notified that the department has received a grant from the federal government. A portion of the grant ($10,000) is being distributed to address substance abuse problems throughout the state. You must decide how to best use these funds to improve the quality of care that substance abuse patients receive in your state. Instructions
For this assignment, you will complete three parts: Part 1: Conduct Research
Conduct research to answer the following:
Identify the three (3) largest cities within the state you reside.
You will be responsible for deciding how the grant will be distributed among these cities.
Prioritize the need for increased substance abuse health resources in each city.
Which city has the highest number of substance abuse patients?
Which city has the most health equity concerns?
Which city has the fewest substance abuse facilities?
Support your reasoning with valid and reliable sources.
Note: There are multiple tools available that can be used to analyze data and make informed decisions. You may use the tools below and additional research. Tools
Part 2: Write a Memo
In a Microsoft Word document, write a memo to the Budget Committee on your findings. Include the following:
Explain how you would like the grant funds distributed among the three (3) largest cities in your state and why. Include pertinent demographic information that supports your rationale, such as population size, geographical location, number of hospitals and healthcare facilities, economic status, race, age, etc.
Address how increased funding will be used to improve quality of care for substance abuse patients.
Explain how health justice and health equity will be affected if this funding is not distributed properly.
Discuss barriers these communities may continue to face if the resources are not provided.
Part 3: Create a Chart or Graph
Create a specialized chart or graph to add support to your memo. Insert the chart or graph into the memo to the Budget Committee. Use professional word choice and correct spelling, grammar, and APA style. Resources
Resources that may be needed to support the completion of the assessment:
How to solve
HSC 3485 Rasmussen University Healthcare Advocacy Health & Medical Paper
To address the issue of limited health resources for substance abuse, a careful analysis of the three largest cities within the state is essential. The goal is to identify the city with the highest number of substance abuse patients, the city with the most health equity concerns, and the city with the fewest substance abuse facilities. This information will help determine how to distribute the grant funds effectively and improve the quality of care for substance abuse patients.
To begin the research, various tools can be utilized, such as the Vulnerable Populations Footprint tool, the Livability Index, the Identify Community Assets and Resources tool, and the Community Health Needs Assessment tool. These tools will provide valuable data and insights into the specific needs and resources available in each city.
In the memo to the Budget Committee, it is important to explain the rationale behind the distribution of grant funds. This should include pertinent demographic information, such as population size, geographical location, the number of hospitals and healthcare facilities, economic status, race, age, and other relevant factors. By considering these factors, the allocation of funds can be tailored to meet the specific needs of each city.
Furthermore, the memo should address how the increased funding will be utilized to improve the quality of care for substance abuse patients. It is necessary to highlight the various aspects of care that will be improved, such as access to treatment facilities, counseling services, medication-assisted treatment, and aftercare programs. Emphasizing the specific strategies and interventions that will be implemented with the funds will demonstrate a clear plan for enhancing the quality of care.
Additionally, it is crucial to discuss how health justice and health equity will be affected if the funding is not distributed properly. This involves exploring the potential consequences of unequal distribution and the impact it may have on marginalized communities. By addressing this issue, it is possible to underscore the importance of equitable distribution and its potential for reducing health disparities.
Lastly, the memo should highlight the barriers that these communities may continue to face if the necessary resources are not provided. This could include limited access to healthcare facilities, transportation challenges, stigma associated with seeking treatment, and lack of culturally competent care. By identifying these barriers, it becomes evident why the grant funds must be allocated strategically to address these challenges and improve the overall health outcomes of substance abuse patients.
In conclusion, conducting thorough research on the three largest cities in the state and understanding their individual needs and resources is crucial when determining the distribution of grant funds for substance abuse patients. By providing a comprehensive memo to the Budget Committee, supported by relevant data and a specialized chart or graph, it is possible to advocate for the appropriate use of funds, address health inequities, and improve the quality of care for substance abuse patients.