- Perform a web search to find and review EHRs.
- Select three (3) preferred EHRs.
- Compare each of the selected EHRs, using the attached assessment form.
- Fill in the right-hand column with your observations/assessment on why your EHR meets/does not meet each standard. Based on the depth of the information provided, you may have to use the knowledge you’ve gained thus far to make assumptions about the EHR functions. (Tip – Add three columns to the far right of the assessment form, one for each selected vendor)
- Write a 1-page summary to accompany your assessment form. The summary should include a comparison of the key functions and factors for the EHR.
- Your assessment form should be in Microsoft Word or Microsoft Excel format. Your summary should be in Microsoft Word format.
- Cite all sources in APA format.
- Submit your assessment form and summary for grading.
- Reminder: You must upload your completed documents using Browse My Computer. Then, hit the Submit button to successfully complete the assignment submission process. Do not copy and paste text into the text box.
Expert Solution Preview
Introduction: This assignment requires a web search to find and review three preferred Electronic Health Records (EHRs) and compare them using an assessment form. The right-hand column of the form should be filled with observations/assessment on why each EHR meets/does not meet each standard. Additionally, a 1-page summary should be written to accompany the assessment form, comparing the key functions and factors for each EHR. This assignment aims to familiarize students with EHRs and their features.
Answer: The three preferred EHRs selected after the web search and review are Cerner, Epic, and NextGen. After comparing each EHR using the attached assessment form, the observations/assessment on why each EHR meets/does not meet each standard is as follows:
– Cerner: Cerner meets the majority of the standards outlined in the assessment form. It provides a comprehensive view of a patient’s health history, streamlines communication between providers, and is highly customizable to meet the needs of various medical specialties. However, Cerner is more expensive than other EHRs and may require more training to use it effectively.
– Epic: Epic is a widely used EHR in the healthcare industry and meets most of the standards in the assessment form. It has robust patient engagement features, an intuitive interface, and provides real-time data analytics. However, Epic is known for being expensive and may have longer implementation timelines compared to other EHRs.
– NextGen: NextGen meets many of the standards in the assessment form, including electronic prescribing and customizable templates. It provides a patient portal for patients to access their health information and offers robust reporting features. However, NextGen may require significant customization to meet the needs of various medical specialties.
In summary, each of the EHRs reviewed has its strengths and weaknesses. Cerner, Epic, and NextGen meet most of the standards outlined in the assessment form, but the cost and implementation timelines may vary. The key factors to consider when selecting an EHR include ease of use, customization, patient engagement features, and cost-effectiveness.
