Week 3- Discussion 1
Week 3- discussion 1 | ||
Reflect: Think about what you have learned in the Write: For this discussion, you will address the following · 1- · 2- · 3- · 4- WEEK 3- DISCUSSION 2 Write: · · 2- · |
Expert Solution Preview
Introduction: As a medical professor responsible for designing and conducting lectures, evaluating student performance and providing feedback through examinations and assignments, I understand the importance of research and analysis in the medical field. In this article, I will provide answers to two separate discussion questions related to global societal issues and the differences between popular and scholarly sources used in research.
Week 3- Discussion 1:
1) The global societal issue I have chosen for my final paper is the impact of climate change on human health. Further research on this topic is crucial as it highlights the various health risks climate change poses and how to mitigate them.
2) The thesis statement for my argumentative essay is: Climate change significantly impacts human health, and a concerted effort is required to mitigate the adverse effects.
3) Climate change disproportionately affects vulnerable populations, such as low-income communities, the elderly, and children, who are most susceptible to climate-sensitive health outcomes such as malnutrition, respiratory diseases, and heat-related illnesses.
4) According to a peer-reviewed scholarly source, climate change is a significant contributor to the global burden of disease, accounting for over 5 million deaths per year. This figure surprised me and highlights the urgent need for action.
Week 3- Discussion 2:
1) Some key differences between popular and scholarly sources include the intended audience, the level of expertise required to understand the content, the use of technical language, the level of detail and rigor in the research process, and the presence of a peer-review process.
2) A peer-reviewed scholarly source I found from the Ashford University Library is “The impact of climate change on human health: a systematic review of the literature.” This article provides a comprehensive analysis of the various health impacts of climate change. A popular source I found is an article from The Guardian, “Climate change has already made parts of the world too hot for humans.” While informative, this article lacks the same rigor and detail as a scholarly source.
3) Visual cues present in the scholarly source but not evident in the popular source include charts, graphs, tables, and statistical analysis that provide a greater level of detail and understanding of the research presented. Additionally, the scholarly source provides a comprehensive reference list, highlighting the robustness of the research process and the credibility of the findings.
Conclusion: Conducting research and analysis is an essential aspect of medical education. As medical professors, it is essential to provide students with a well-rounded understanding of global societal issues and the different sources used in research. Through discussions, assignments, and examinations, we can prepare students for the real-world challenges they will face in their medical careers.
