In 750-1,000 words, develop an evaluation plan to be included in your final evidence-based practice project proposal. You will use the evaluation plan in the Topic 8 assignment, during which you will synthesize the various aspects of your project into a final paper detailing your evidence-based practice project proposal.
Provide the following criteria in the evaluation, making sure it is comprehensive and concise:
- Discuss the expected outcomes for your evidence-based practice project proposal.
- Review the various data collection tools associated with your selected research design and select one data collection tool that would be effective for your research design. Explain how this tool is valid, reliable, and applicable.
- Select a statistical test for your project and explain why it is best suited for the tool you choose.
- Describe what methods you will apply to your data collection tool and how the outcomes will be measured and evaluated based on the tool you selected.
- Propose strategies that will be taken if outcomes do not provide positive or expected results.
- Describe the plans to maintain, extend, revise, and discontinue a proposed solution after implementation.
Refer to the “Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal – Assignment Overview” document for an overview of the evidence-based practice project proposal assignments.
You are required to cite a minimum of five peer-reviewed sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.
My PICOT statement
In patients with ejection fraction less than 30% (P), is individualized heart failure education (I) more effective than standard discharge instruction (C) in reducing hospital readmission (O) over six months (T)?
Expert Solution Preview
Introduction:
The evaluation plan plays a critical role in assessing the effectiveness of an evidence-based practice project proposal. The plan details the expected project outcomes, data collection tools, statistical tests, methods of data collection, evaluation processes, and strategies to be employed to address unfavorable outcomes. This essay provides a comprehensive and concise evaluation plan for an evidence-based practice project proposal that seeks to determine the effectiveness of individualized heart failure education in reducing hospital readmission in patients with ejection fraction less than 30% over six months.
Expected Outcomes:
The primary expected outcome of the evidence-based practice project proposal is to reduce hospital readmission rates in patients with ejection fraction less than 30%. The project aims to achieve this outcome by testing the effectiveness of individualized heart failure education compared to standard discharge instruction in reducing hospital readmissions. Additionally, the project seeks to evaluate the effectiveness of a personalized approach in educating patients on self-care measures, adherence to medication, and recognizing early warning signs of heart failure. The project’s secondary expected outcome is to improve patients’ quality of life by managing their heart failure symptoms and increasing their knowledge and understanding of heart failure management.
Data Collection Tool:
The data collection tool that is effective for this research design is questionnaires. The questionnaires will assess the patients’ knowledge, behaviors, and adherence to heart failure self-care measures, medication, and early warning signs. These questionnaires will be valid, reliable, and applicable because they will capture essential information regarding patients’ health status, examine their behaviors, and provide insight into the level of understanding concerning heart failure management. These questionnaires will also be standardized and internally consistent, therefore, making the data collection process more efficient and effective.
Statistical Test:
The most appropriate statistical test for this project is the chi-square test. This test is best suited to analyze the relationship between two categorical variables, such as the relationship between individualized heart failure education and standard discharge instruction and hospital readmission rates. The chi-square test will enable the project team to evaluate the association between the two variables and determine whether the differences observed between the two groups are statistically significant.
Methods of Data Collection and Outcome Evaluation:
The project team will conduct data collection through questionnaires that will be administered to patients upon admission and six months post-discharge. The data collection tool will assess the patients’ knowledge, behaviors, and adherence to heart failure self-care measures, medication, and early warning signs. The outcomes will be measured and evaluated based on the data collected from the questionnaires.
If the outcomes of the project do not provide positive or expected results, strategies will be employed to address the problem. These strategies may include revisiting the research design to identify any potential biases or errors that may have influenced the results. Additionally, the project team may consider conducting further research to gain more insight into the factors that may have affected the project outcomes. These strategies will enable the team to identify areas that require improvement and develop appropriate interventions to address the problem.
Plans for Maintaining, Extending, Revising, and Discontinuing the Proposed Solution:
After implementing the proposed solution, the project team will develop plans to maintain, extend, revise, or discontinue the intervention based on the outcomes. If the project outcomes are positive and meet the expected goals, the team will maintain the intervention and develop plans for extending the program to other healthcare facilities. If the intervention outcomes are not satisfactory or do not meet the expected goals, the team will revisit the research design to identify areas that require revision. If the intervention is deemed ineffective, the project team may consider discontinuing the program and identifying other interventions that may be more effective.
Conclusion:
The evaluation plan plays a critical role in assessing the effectiveness of an evidence-based practice project proposal. Therefore, the plan must be comprehensive and concise, outlining the expected outcomes, data collection tools, statistical tests, methods of data collection, evaluation processes, and strategies to address unfavorable outcomes. This essay has developed an evaluation plan for an evidence-based practice project proposal that seeks to determine the effectiveness of individualized heart failure education in reducing hospital readmission rates in patients with ejection fraction less than 30%. The project will employ questionnaires as the data collection tool and the chi-square test as the statistical test. Strategies will be implemented to address unfavorable outcomes, while plans for maintaining, extending, revising, and discontinuing the proposed solution will also be developed and implemented.
