Download the required article for analysis:
Colvin, C. M., Karius, D., & Albert, N. M. (2016). Nurse adherence to safe-handling practices: Observation versus self-assessment. Clinical Journal of Oncology Nursing, 20(6), 617-622. doi:10.1188/16.CJON.617-622
(Links to an external site.)
Running head is: Research Article Critique Paper
Paper page is 6-7 pages not including front page and references
1.Introduction (one paragraph): The introduction should be interesting and capture the reader’s attention.
a. Provide a brief description of the research article to be discussed.
b. Discuss the purpose of your paper. The purpose statement of the paper should relate to the research article reviewed and the implications that it has to evidence based nursing practice.
c.You will need to summarize and analyze the information from the article in your own words
2. Describe the research question for this study in a paragraph.
a. Describe the research in greater detail.
b. Include your observations about this question.
c. Discuss events or trends that could have affected this question.
d. You will need to summarize and analyze the information from the article in your own words
3. Describe the research design of this study, and in your own words discuss the design.
a. Discuss the research design of the study.
b. Discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the type of design and hypothesize why the author utilized the design as opposed to others.
c. You will need to summarize the information from the article in your own words
4. Describe the sample.
a. Briefly describe the sample size used for this study
b. Make a judgment as to whether the sample size was adequate and defend your answer.
c. Describe the number or participants and determine if the number of participants was adequate compared to the research question and the intent of the study.
d. Are these numbers adequate? Discuss gaps in that you identified.
e. You will need to summarize and analyze the information from the article in your own words
5. Describe the data collection method(s)’
a.Who collected the data?
b. What tools were used?
c. What were the ethical considerations addressed and discuss gaps you identified.
d. You will need to summarize and analyze the information from the article in your own words
6. Describe the limitations of the study.
a. Identify the limitations within the study
b. Describe how the limitations could be overcome in subsequent studies
c. Comment on why limitations are important to list and discuss within a study
d. You will need to summarize and analyze the information from the article in your own words
7. Describe the findings reported in the study.
a. Describe the findings reported in the study
b. Discuss whether the findings of the study answered the research question posed within the study
c. Discuss the credibility of the findings
d. If the findings do not support the research question posed within the study, what do you believe is the reason?
e. you will need to summarize and analyze the information from the article in your own words
8. Summary of Required Article
a. Summarizes important points from the required article.
b. Discuss your rationale for whether a practice change is warranted.
c. Based on these findings, is the evidence that you found on your topic strong enough to suggest a change in practice or an idea for practice, or an idea for practice?
9. End with a concluding statement.
10. Citations and References must be included to support the information within each topic area.
11. Reference Page: The Reference Page should start on a new page (insert a page break). All references should be cited within the body of the paper as (Author, year) and the full reference should be included in APA format on the reference page.
.
Expert Solution Preview
Introduction:
In this research article critique, the study by Colvin, Karius, and Albert (2016) titled “Nurse adherence to safe-handling practices: Observation versus self-assessment” will be discussed. This paper aims to evaluate the research article and analyze its implications for evidence-based nursing practice. The purpose of this critique is to summarize and analyze the information from the article in one’s own words.
1. The research question for this study is to determine the level of adherence of nurses to safe-handling practices by comparing observation versus self-assessment. The researchers examined whether nurses accurately self-assess their adherence to these practices. The purpose of this study is to determine the accuracy of self-assessment compared to actual observation and identify any discrepancies or gaps in nurses’ understanding and adherence to safe-handling practices.
2. The research design of this study was a cross-sectional descriptive design. The researchers collected data by observing nurses’ adherence to safe-handling practices and comparing it to the nurses’ self-assessment of their adherence. The study involved a sample of 203 nurses, and data collection took place in 11 outpatient cancer treatment centers. The researchers utilized this design to gain insight into nurses’ perceptions and actual behaviors regarding safe-handling practices.
3. The sample size used for this study was 203 nurses from 11 outpatient cancer treatment centers. The authors did not provide a clear rationale for this sample size, but it can be deemed adequate as it allows for a reasonable representation of the population under study. The number of participants in the study was adequate compared to the research question and study intent. There were no apparent gaps in this regard.
4. The data for this study was collected through direct observation by two trained observers, who recorded nurses’ adherence to safe-handling practices. The observers used a checklist tool specifically developed for this study. The ethical considerations addressed included obtaining informed consent from the participants and maintaining confidentiality of the collected data. It is important to note that self-assessment data was collected separately from the observed data. A potential gap in this study is the potential for bias in self-assessment, as individuals may overestimate their adherence to safe-handling practices.
5. The limitations of this study include the use of self-assessment, which may be subjective and influenced by social desirability bias. Additionally, the study was conducted in outpatient cancer treatment centers, limiting its generalizability to other healthcare settings. The limitations could be overcome in subsequent studies by including diverse healthcare settings and incorporating objective measures of adherence to validate self-assessment.
6. The findings reported in the study showed that nurses’ self-assessment of adherence to safe-handling practices was higher compared to the observed adherence. This indicates a discrepancy between nurses’ perceptions and their actual behaviors. The findings did answer the research question posed in the study by highlighting the inaccuracy of self-assessment. The credibility of the findings is enhanced by the use of direct observation as a comparison to self-assessment. The reason for the lack of support for the research question could be attributed to the bias and overestimation tendencies present in self-assessment.
7. In summary, this research article critique discussed the study by Colvin, Karius, and Albert (2016) regarding nurse adherence to safe-handling practices. The research design, sample size, data collection methods, limitations, and findings were analyzed. This study provides evidence that self-assessment of adherence to safe-handling practices may be inaccurate compared to direct observation. Based on these findings, it is warranted to consider changes in practice, such as implementing objective measures and training programs to improve nurses’ understanding of safe-handling practices.
In conclusion, this critique highlighted the importance of accuracy in self-assessment of adherence to safe-handling practices among nurses. Future research should focus on developing strategies to overcome the limitations identified in this study and explore potential interventions to enhance nurses’ adherence to safe-handling practices.
