Reflect on responses to the presented scenario.
Reflection involves critical thinking, which means rethinking your existing knowledge and previously held opinions in light of what we have learned about theories of ethics, logic, and reasoning. You will need to question your current knowledge and beliefs. Discuss the main points of the debate, what stance you take, support that stance, and discuss the opposing argument. Also, discuss an ethical theory that would apply to defend your view. Make sure to answer the questions that are in bullet points below. You can only use the 6 ethical theories that are as followed : Kant; Act Utilitarianism; Rule Utilitarianism; Care Ethics; Virtue Ethics; and Social Contract)
Why do you feel the way you do about the issue presented?
Of the four responses offered in the scenario, which do you think is the most ethical and why?
Which ethical theory would you use to support your stance? Why does this theory work?
What are the key points of contention on this topic?
What side of the argument (stance) do you take on this topic?
What strong points does the other side of this topic have?
What were the three most important things you took away from the topic?
Which ethical theory (of the 6 approved ones ONLY – Kant; Act Utilitarianism; Rule Utilitarianism; Care Ethics; Virtue Ethics; and Social Contract) would you apply to this topic to defend your stance? Explain fully.
In this reflection you must first define the key terms of the debate (for example, define what Euthanasia means and what are the different types depending on which topic you are discussing)
Define and explain the ethical theory you chose (show me you know exactly what the theory is and does – in your own words)
Present the evidence both pro and con and follow up how using your ethical theory is the best way to determine whether or not your stance is really ethical
Conclusion – any final thoughts and opinions.
How to solve
CSUN Health & Medical the Ethics of Euthanasia Discussion
Introduction:
The issue presented in the scenario revolves around a topic of ethical debate, and as a medical professor in charge of designing college assignments, evaluating student performance, and providing feedback, it is important to critically reflect on the various responses and perspectives surrounding the issue. In this reflection, we will analyze the main points of the debate, discuss personal stance, explore opposing arguments, and apply an ethical theory to defend the chosen viewpoint.
Why do you feel the way you do about the issue presented?
Each individual’s personal beliefs and values shape their perspective on ethical issues. In this case, my viewpoint may be influenced by a combination of personal experiences, professional knowledge, and the ethical principles that underpin medical practice. It is crucial to approach the issue with an open mind and consider the potential impact on patients, healthcare providers, and society as a whole.
Of the four responses offered in the scenario, which do you think is the most ethical and why?
Out of the four responses presented in the scenario, the most ethical one would be the option that upholds the principles of patient autonomy, beneficence, and non-maleficence. A response that emphasizes the patient’s right to make their own medical decisions, respects their autonomy, and ensures their well-being aligns with the ethical foundations of medical practice.
Which ethical theory would you use to support your stance? Why does this theory work?
To support the chosen stance, the ethical theory of autonomy, as derived from Kantian ethics, would be appropriate. Kant’s moral philosophy emphasizes the importance of treating individuals as rational beings capable of autonomous decision-making. This theory respects the principle of autonomy, which is fundamental in medical ethics, and holds that individuals have the right to make decisions about their own lives, including their medical treatment. By considering and respecting the person’s autonomy, this theory ensures that ethical decisions prioritize individual rights and respect for individual dignity.
What are the key points of contention on this topic?
The key points of contention on this topic may revolve around the balance between autonomy and potential harm to the patient. Some argue that prioritizing a patient’s autonomy could result in decisions that may harm the patient, particularly in cases where medical interventions are against the professional judgment of healthcare providers. Additionally, there may be debates regarding societal perceptions and cultural influences on end-of-life decisions, the role of informed consent, and the legal aspects of euthanasia.
What side of the argument (stance) do you take on this topic?
On this topic, I take the stance that individuals should have the autonomy to make decisions about their own end-of-life choices, including euthanasia, under specific circumstances. However, the considerations for this stance must include stringent safeguards, such as thorough evaluation of the patient’s mental capacity, documentation of informed consent, and the involvement of a multidisciplinary team to ensure a comprehensive assessment of the situation.
What strong points does the other side of this topic have?
The opposing side of this topic may argue that introducing euthanasia could potentially undermine the sanctity of life and the duty of healthcare professionals to preserve life. They may highlight concerns about the potential for abuse, the slippery slope argument, and the importance of palliative care as an alternative to euthanasia. Additionally, the opposition may emphasize the ethical obligation of healthcare professionals to alleviate suffering rather than facilitating intentional death.
What were the three most important things you took away from the topic?
1. The concept of patient autonomy and its significance in medical ethics.
2. The need for a balanced approach between individual decision-making and professional judgment to ensure patient well-being and safety.
3. The importance of comprehensive safeguards and ethical guidelines to govern end-of-life decisions involving euthanasia.
Which ethical theory (of the 6 approved ones ONLY – Kant; Act Utilitarianism; Rule Utilitarianism; Care Ethics; Virtue Ethics; and Social Contract) would you apply to this topic to defend your stance? Explain fully.
To defend the chosen stance, the ethical theory of autonomy derived from Kantian ethics would be applied. As previously mentioned, this theory places a strong emphasis on the principle of respect for individual autonomy and moral agency. By employing Kant’s categorical imperative, which states that individuals should be treated as ends in themselves and not merely as means to an end, we can ensure that patients are granted the autonomy and dignity required to make informed choices about their own lives, including decisions regarding euthanasia.
Conclusion:
Reflecting on the presented scenario and the ethical considerations surrounding the issue, it is clear that the topic of euthanasia raises significant ethical debates. The stance taken in this reflection is rooted in the ethical theory of autonomy, derived from Kantian ethics, which emphasizes the importance of respecting individual autonomy and dignity in medical decision-making. By considering the principles of patient autonomy, beneficence, and non-maleficence, a balanced approach can be achieved that respects the rights of individuals while prioritizing their well-being.
