Discussion topic
- Compare and contrast Kubler-Ross’ stages of death and dying, and Worden’s task of mourning. Which model would you use, and why? Would there ever be a time that you would use both models to help a person out, and why? Provide examples of cases where you would use either, or both, of the models.
- What type of prevention and interventions would you use when working with a person and his/her family with substance abuse issues? Pick two interventions and show how you would use them with the person who is abusing, as well as with that person’s family.
Expert Solution Preview
Introduction:
As a medical professor responsible for designing college assignments and evaluating student performance, it’s important to have a deep understanding of various models and interventions used in healthcare. In this response, we will address the two following questions in detail.
1. Compare and contrast Kubler-Ross’ stages of death and dying, and Worden’s task of mourning. Which model would you use, and why? Would there ever be a time that you would use both models to help a person out, and why? Provide examples of cases where you would use either, or both, of the models.
Kubler-Ross’ stages of death and dying and Worden’s task of mourning are both psychological models used to understand and cope with grief and loss. While Kubler-Ross’ model outlines five stages that a dying person goes through, Worden’s model focuses on four tasks that a person needs to complete to overcome grief and achieve normal functioning.
The five stages of Kubler-Ross’ model include denial, anger, bargaining, depression, and acceptance. On the other hand, Worden’s four tasks include accepting the reality of the loss, processing the pain of the grief, adjusting to a new environment, and maintaining a connection with the deceased while moving forward.
If I had to choose between the two models, I would choose Worden’s task of mourning. This is because unlike Kubler-Ross’ model that primarily focuses on how a dying person thinks, Worden’s model applies to anyone who is grieving a loss, regardless of whether or not the loss was expected. The model’s focus on concrete tasks which help a person gain a sense of control over their grief truly stands out to me.
However, in certain cases, it may be useful to use both models. For example, if a person is struggling to accept the reality of their loss, Kubler-Ross’ stages of denial and anger can be applied to help them process their emotions effectively. Once they have moved through these stages, Worden’s tasks can be implemented to help them adjust to a new environment and maintain a connection to the deceased.
2. What type of prevention and interventions would you use when working with a person and his/her family with substance abuse issues? Pick two interventions and show how you would use them with the person who is abusing, as well as with that person’s family.
When working with a person and their family who are struggling with substance abuse issues, it is essential to use evidence-based interventions that are grounded in best practice. Two interventions that are particularly effective include motivational interviewing (MI) and family therapy.
Motivational interviewing is a goal-oriented technique that helps people resolve ambivalent feelings and insecurities to find the internal motivation they need to change their behavior. When working with a person who is struggling with substance abuse, MI can be used to increase their motivation to change their behavior. This can be achieved by exploring their ambivalence and allowing them to recognize how their substance abuse is causing problems in their life. Additionally, MI can be used to identify personal values and goals that can be achieved by abstaining from substance abuse. Finally, MI can also be used to strengthen coping skills, improve self-esteem and increase a person’s self-efficacy regarding recovery.
Family-focused interventions are utilized to treat a wide range of mental health disorders, including substance abuse. Family therapy involves engaging family members in the treatment process to resolve concerns that affect the family unit. In the case of substance abuse, family therapy can help family members understand their role in their loved one’s addiction and identify ways to support their loved one’s recovery. Additionally, family therapy can also help family members learn how to communicate in healthy ways, set boundaries and improve problem-solving skills. Ultimately, family-focused interventions can lead to better treatment outcomes, healthier family relationships, and more significant support during the recovery process.
In conclusion, these two interventions can be used in a variety of ways when working with individuals and families who are struggling with substance abuse disorders. It is essential to utilize evidence-based treatments to ensure that people receive the most effective and appropriate care.
