Benchmark Assignment: Comprehensive Assessment:Outcomes and Reflection

Details:

The DNP comprehensive assessment provides learners the opportunity to demonstrate their achievement of core and specialty DNP competencies. It is also an appraisal of learners’ ability to integrate and synthesize knowledge within the context of their scholarly and practice interests and their readiness to complete the DPI project. The two-part comprehensive assessment includes evaluation of work completed throughout the program and a final synthesis and self-reflection demonstrating achievement of programmatic outcomes. In Part One of the assessment, learners were required to collect and review coursework deliverables and practice immersion hours completed in the program thus far. In Part Two, learners are required to synthesize and reflect on their learning and prioritize work for their DPI project.

General Requirements:

Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment:

  • Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments. The APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success Center.
  • This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
  • You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.

Directions:

To complete Part Two of the DNP comprehensive assessment:

Use the information collected in the competency matrix from Comprehensive Assessment Part One to address the following prompts as directed. Each response should be 500-750 words. Your responses should concisely demonstrate synthesis of knowledge gained in the program and the relevant application of knowledge into your practice. You are further required to cite relevant and specific evidence from your coursework to demonstrate your achievement of these programmatic outcomes and corresponding competencies. Review the rubric for this assignment prior to responding to the prompts. Your responses should specifically address the competencies included on the rubric.

Outcome 1:

A DNP must integrate and apply appropriate nursing and science-based theories to evaluate and analyze health and health care phenomena and develop and implement innovative practice approaches.

In what ways have you integrated and applied nursing and science-based theories in your coursework and practice during your DNP course of study? How will you apply what you have learned to your DPI project? Cite specific evidence from your coursework and practice immersion hours in your response.

Outcome 2:

A DNP must provide the leadership to develop and implement health care and organizational policy based on regulatory and other external and internal factors and drive effective change within organizations.

In what ways have you demonstrated leadership in the development and implementation of policy or policy change and contributed to quality improvement during your DNP studies? How will you apply what you have learned to your DPI project? Cite specific evidence from your coursework and practice immersion hours in your response.

Outcome 3:

A DNP must be able use information systems to mine, analyze, and apply data for the purpose of improving information systems as well as patient and organizational outcomes.

In what ways have you successfully applied data analysis to the improvement of information systems, patient care, and organizational outcomes during your course of study? How will you apply what you have learned to your DPI project? Cite specific evidence from your coursework and practice immersion hours in your response.

Outcome 4:

A DNP must be able to articulate and implement strategy and to advocate for the ethical and equitable deployment of care delivery models for improvement of individual, aggregate, and population health management.

In what ways have you articulated, deployed, or advocated for such strategies in your coursework and practice immersion hours? How will you apply what you have learned to your DPI project? Cite specific evidence from your coursework and practice immersion hours in your response.

Outcome 5:

A DNP must be able to evaluate practice outcomes and use research, national benchmarks, and other relevant findings from evidence-based practice to design, direct, utilize, and evaluate quality improvement methodologies that lead to improved patient-centered care.

In what ways have you evaluated practice outcomes and participated in quality improvement initiatives in your coursework and practice immersion hours? How will you apply what you have learned to your DPI project? Cite specific evidence from your coursework and practice immersion hours in your response.

Self-Reflection:

Based on an evaluation of your learning to date, assess your readiness for undertaking your DPI project. How has what you learned in your coursework and practice immersion hours and application of learning in your practice informed your approach to your project? What do you need to revise in your 10 Strategic Points document and/or your Draft Prospectus to successfully implement your project? Reflect on your progress to this point and outline the steps necessary to successfully complete your DPI Project Proposal for the Institutional Review Board (IRB) in DNP-955.

Apply Rubrics

Benchmark Assignment – Comprehensive Assessment Part Two: Outcomes and Reflection

1
No Submission
0.00%

2
Incomplete Submission
74.00%

3
Nominal Submission
79.00%

4
Satisfactory Submission
87.00%

5
Exemplary Submission
100.00%

9.0 %Outcome 1

5.0 %Apply Science-Based Theories and Concepts to Determine the Nature and Significance of Health and Health Care Delivery Phenomena. Benchmark (C: 1.2)

No submission.

Submission includes insufficient incorporation of the required criteria.

Submission includes minimal evidence of the required outcome criteria. Support is vague or incomplete.

Submission includes adequate evidence of the required outcome criteria. Discussion is thorough and defines specific elements but is not as complete as expected.

Submission includes comprehensive and convincing evidence of the required outcome criteria. The submission further provides analysis of supporting evidence insightfully and provides specific examples with relevance. Level of detail is appropriate.

4.0 %Employ Science-Based Theories and Concepts to Describe the Actions and Advanced Strategies to Enhance, Alleviate, and Ameliorate Health and Health Care Delivery Phenomena as Appropriate. Benchmark (C: 1.3)

No submission.

Submission includes insufficient incorporation of the required criteria.

Submission includes minimal evidence of the required outcome criteria. Support is vague or incomplete.

Submission includes adequate evidence of the required outcome criteria. Discussion is thorough and defines specific elements but is not as complete as expected.

Submission includes comprehensive and convincing evidence of the required outcome criteria. The submission further provides analysis of supporting evidence insightfully and provides specific examples with relevance. Level of detail is appropriate.

9.0 %Outcome 2

3.0 %Employ Principles of Business, Finance, Economics, and Health Policy to Develop and Implement Effective Plans for Practice-Level or System-Wide Practice Initiatives That Will Improve the Quality of Health Care Delivery. Benchmark (C: 2.1)

No submission.

Submission includes insufficient incorporation of the required criteria.

Submission includes minimal evidence of the required outcome criteria. Support is vague or incomplete.

Submission includes adequate evidence of the required outcome criteria. Discussion is thorough and defines specific elements but is not as complete as expected.

Submission includes comprehensive and convincing evidence of the required outcome criteria. The submission further provides analysis of supporting evidence insightfully and provides specific examples with relevance. Level of detail is appropriate.

3.0 %Demonstrate Leadership, Influence, and Advocacy in the Development and Implementation of Institutional, Local, State, Federal, or International Health Policy. Benchmark (C: 2.2)

No submission.

Submission includes insufficient incorporation of the required criteria.

Submission includes minimal evidence of the required outcome criteria. Support is vague or incomplete.

Submission includes adequate evidence of the required outcome criteria. Discussion is thorough and defines specific elements but is not as complete as expected.

Submission includes comprehensive and convincing evidence of the required outcome criteria. The submission further provides analysis of supporting evidence insightfully and provides specific examples with relevance. Level of detail is appropriate.

3.0 %Provide Leadership in the Evaluation and Resolution of Policy, Ethical, and Legal Issues Within Health Care Systems. Benchmark (C: 2.4)

No submission.

Submission includes insufficient incorporation of the required criteria.

Submission includes minimal evidence of the required outcome criteria. Support is vague or incomplete.

Submission includes adequate evidence of the required outcome criteria. Discussion is thorough and defines specific elements but is not as complete as expected.

Submission includes comprehensive and convincing evidence of the required outcome criteria. The submission further provides analysis of supporting evidence insightfully and provides specific examples with relevance. Level of detail is appropriate.

9.0 %Outcome 3

2.0 %Demonstrate the Conceptual Ability and Technical Skills to Develop and Execute an Evaluation Plan Involving Data Extraction From Practice Information Systems and Databases. Benchmark (C: 3.1)

No submission.

Submission includes insufficient incorporation of the required criteria.

Submission includes minimal evidence of the required outcome criteria. Support is vague or incomplete.

Submission includes adequate evidence of the required outcome criteria. Discussion is thorough and defines specific elements but is not as complete as expected.

Submission includes comprehensive and convincing evidence of the required outcome criteria. The submission further provides analysis of supporting evidence insightfully and provides specific examples with relevance. Level of detail is appropriate.

2.0 %Evaluate Current Consumer Health Information Sources for Accuracy, Timeliness, and Appropriateness.Benchmark (C: 3.2)

No submission.

Submission includes insufficient incorporation of the required criteria.

Submission includes minimal evidence of the required outcome criteria. Support is vague or incomplete.

Submission includes adequate evidence of the required outcome criteria. Discussion is thorough and defines specific elements but is not as complete as expected.

Submission includes comprehensive and convincing evidence of the required outcome criteria. The submission further provides analysis of supporting evidence insightfully and provides specific examples with relevance. Level of detail is appropriate.

2.0 %Analyze and communicate critical elements necessary to the selection, use, and evaluation of health information systems and patient care technology. Benchmark (C: 3.3)

No submission.

Submission includes insufficient incorporation of the required criteria.

Submission includes minimal evidence of the required outcome criteria. Support is vague or incomplete.

Submission includes adequate evidence of the required outcome criteria. Discussion is thorough and defines specific elements but is not as complete as expected.

Submission includes comprehensive and convincing evidence of the required outcome criteria. The submission further provides analysis of supporting evidence insightfully and provides specific examples with relevance. Level of detail is appropriate.

3.0 %Design, Select, Use, and Evaluate Programs That Monitor Outcomes of Care, Care Systems, and Quality Improvement, Including Consumer Use of Health Care Information Systems. Benchmark (C: 3.4)

No submission.

Submission includes insufficient incorporation of the required criteria.

Submission includes minimal evidence of the required outcome criteria. Support is vague or incomplete.

Submission includes adequate evidence of the required outcome criteria. Discussion is thorough and defines specific elements but is not as complete as expected.

Submission includes comprehensive and convincing evidence of the required outcome criteria. The submission further provides analysis of supporting evidence insightfully and provides specific examples with relevance. Level of detail is appropriate.

9.0 %Outcome 4

5.0 %Analyze Epidemiological, Biostatistical, Environmental, and Other Appropriate Scientific Data Related to Individual, Aggregate, and Population Health. Benchmark (C: 4.1)

No submission.

Submission includes insufficient incorporation of the required criteria.

Submission includes minimal evidence of the required outcome criteria. Support is vague or incomplete.

Submission includes adequate evidence of the required outcome criteria. Discussion is thorough and defines specific elements but is not as complete as expected.

Submission includes comprehensive and convincing evidence of the required outcome criteria. The submission further provides analysis of supporting evidence insightfully and provides specific examples with relevance. Level of detail is appropriate.

4.0 %Advocate for Social Justice, Equity, and Ethical Policies Within All Health Care Arenas. Benchmark (C: 4.4)

No submission.

Submission includes insufficient incorporation of the required criteria.

Submission includes minimal evidence of the required outcome criteria. Support is vague or incomplete.

Submission includes adequate evidence of the required outcome criteria. Discussion is thorough and defines specific elements but is not as complete as expected.

Submission includes comprehensive and convincing evidence of the required outcome criteria. The submission further provides analysis of supporting evidence insightfully and provides specific examples with relevance. Level of detail is appropriate.

9.0 %Outcome 5

5.0 %Design and Implement Processes/Strategies That Evaluate Outcomes of Practice, Practice Patterns, and Systems of Care For Individual, Aggregate, and Populations Against National Benchmarks. Benchmark (C: 5.2)

No submission.

Submission includes insufficient incorporation of the required criteria.

Submission includes minimal evidence of the required outcome criteria. Support is vague or incomplete.

Submission includes adequate evidence of the required outcome criteria. Discussion is thorough and defines specific elements but is not as complete as expected.

Submission includes comprehensive and convincing evidence of the required outcome criteria. The submission further provides analysis of supporting evidence insightfully and provides specific examples with relevance. Level of detail is appropriate.

4.0 %Design, Direct, and Evaluate Quality Improvement Methodologies to Promote Safe, Timely, Effective, Efficient, Equitable, and Patient-Centered Care. Benchmark (C: 5.3)

No submission.

Submission includes insufficient incorporation of the required criteria.

Submission includes minimal evidence of the required outcome criteria. Support is vague or incomplete.

Submission includes adequate evidence of the required outcome criteria. Discussion is thorough and defines specific elements but is not as complete as expected.

Submission includes comprehensive and convincing evidence of the required outcome criteria. The submission further provides analysis of supporting evidence insightfully and provides specific examples with relevance. Level of detail is appropriate.

25.0 %Self-Reflection

25.0 %Assessment of Readiness to Undertake the DPI Project Based on Self-Evaluation of Program Content Learning

No submission.

Submission includes a partial or incomplete assessment of the readiness of learner to undertake the DPI project, or the submission does not incorporate self-evaluation of program content learning.

Submission includes minimal assessment of the readiness of learner to undertake the DPI project and insufficient self-evaluation of program content learning.

Submission includes an adequate assessment of the readiness of learner to undertake the DPI project which incorporates a sufficient self-evaluation of program content learning. Discussion is thorough and defines specific elements but is not as complete as expected.

Submission includes a comprehensive and thorough assessment of the readiness of learner to undertake the DPI project. The self-evaluation of program content learning component is robust. The submission provides insightful analysis of supporting evidence with specific, relevant examples. Level of detail is appropriate.

20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness

7.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose

No submission.

Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear.

Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose.

Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.

Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.

8.0 %Argument Logic and Construction

No submission.

Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.

Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.

Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.

Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.

5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

No submission.

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present.

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used.

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used.

Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

10.0 %Format

5.0 %Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and the assignment)

No submission.

Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.

Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.

Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.

All format elements are correct.

5.0 %APA Format

No submission.

Required format is attempted, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. Some sources are not scholarly research or topic-related. Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used.

Required format is used correctly, although some minor errors may be present. Scholarly research sources are present and topic-related, but the source and quality of some references is questionable. Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present.

Required format is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting. Scholarly research accounts for the majority of sources presented and is topic-related and obtained from reputable professional sources. Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and citation style is usually correct.

The document is correctly formatted to publication standards. All research presented is scholarly, topic-related, and obtained from highly respected, professional, original sources. In-text citations and a reference page are complete and correct. The documentation of cited sources is free of error.

100 %Total Weightage

Expert Solution Preview

Introduction:
As a medical professor responsible for creating college assignments and providing feedback to medical college students, it is important to assess their understanding of core and specialty DNP competencies. This includes their ability to integrate and synthesize knowledge within the context of their scholarly and practice interests and their readiness to complete the DPI project. In Part Two of the DNP comprehensive assessment, students are required to synthesize and reflect on their learning and prioritize work for their DPI project. In this answer, we will provide responses to the prompts provided, addressing the five outcomes and self-reflection criteria.

Outcome 1:
Throughout my DNP coursework and practice immersion hours, I have integrated and applied nursing and science-based theories in various ways. In my coursework, I have used nursing theories to understand complex patient cases and develop care plans that integrate evidence-based medicine and patient preferences. Science-based theories have helped me evaluate and analyze health and health care phenomena, understand the principles of health informatics and telemedicine and consider how emerging technologies can impact healthcare delivery and patient outcomes. In my practice immersion hours, I worked with the interdisciplinary team to develop innovative practice approaches that address the challenges of complex cases and evaluate the effectiveness of those approaches in improving patient outcomes. For instance, I was involved in a project that evaluated the effectiveness of telemedicine in improving access to care for patients in remote areas. I intend to apply these theories to my DPI project by using nursing and science-based theories to understand the health outcomes of patients in a managed care organization and developing innovative care practices that promote better patient outcomes.

Outcome 2:
During my DNP studies, I have demonstrated leadership in the development and implementation of policy change and contributed to quality improvement initiatives. In my coursework, I have learned how to use principles of business, finance, economics, and health policy to develop and implement effective plans for practice-level or system-wide practice initiatives that will improve the quality of health care delivery. This culminated in my leadership role in the development of a policy on the use of telemedicine in our hospital system. In my practice immersion hours, I led several quality improvement initiatives aimed at enhancing the patient experience and reducing hospital-acquired infections. For instance, I led the development of a comprehensive discharge planning tool that helped patients and their families understand and manage their care after hospitalization. I intend to apply what I have learned to my DPI project by developing innovative health care delivery models that are grounded by policy and promote the equitable deployment of care.

Outcome 3:
Throughout my DNP course of study, I have applied data analysis to improve information systems, patient care, and organizational outcomes. In my coursework, I have learned how to use information systems to mine, analyze, and apply data for the purpose of improving patient and organizational outcomes. For instance, I conducted a data analysis project that evaluated the use of mHealth technologies in improving medication adherence and reducing hospital readmissions. In my practice immersion hours, I conducted a chart review study that evaluated the effectiveness of electronic health records in reducing medication errors. I intend to apply what I have learned to my DPI project by using data analysis techniques to evaluate the impact of managed care interventions on patient outcomes, cost, and utilization.

Outcome 4:
Throughout my DNP course of study I have articulated, deployed, or advocated for strategies that promote ethical and equitable deployment of care delivery models for improvement of individuals, aggregate, and population health management. In my coursework, I have learned about the principles of population health management, including strategies for improving health outcomes and quality of care for specific populations. In my practice immersion hours, I led a project that evaluated the effectiveness of a care coordination program in improving the health outcomes of patients with diabetes. I also advocated for the implementation of a program aimed at improving health outcomes among medically underserved populations. I intend to apply what I have learned to my DPI project by developing care delivery models that are equitable, patient-centered, and designed to improve the health outcomes of the population being served.

Outcome 5:
During my DNP course of study, I have evaluated practice outcomes and participated in quality improvement initiatives to improve patient-centered care. In my coursework, I learned how to evaluate practice outcomes using evidence-based practice and national benchmarks, as well as design, direct, utilize, and evaluate quality improvement methodologies that lead to improved patient-centered care. For instance, I participated in a project that evaluated the effectiveness of a new pain management protocol in reducing opioid consumption among hospitalized patients. In my practice immersion hours, I led a project aimed at reducing hospital-acquired infections by enhancing hand hygiene compliance through staff education. I intend to apply what I have learned to my DPI project by evaluating care outcomes and engaging in quality improvement initiatives using evidence-based practice and national benchmarks to improve the delivery of care.

Self-Reflection:
Based on an evaluation of my learning to date, I believe I am well-prepared to undertake my DPI project. My coursework and practice immersion hours have provided me with the necessary knowledge and skills to develop and execute a successful evaluation plan and develop innovative care delivery models. Through my practice immersion hours, I have gained hands-on experience in healthcare and developed a better understanding of the complex challenges that face healthcare providers in delivering high-quality care. Additionally, I have learned to work effectively with interdisciplinary teams, identify processes and workflow issues, and use data to drive organizational change.

However, I need to revise my 10 Strategic Points document and/or Draft Prospectus to incorporate the new knowledge and skills that I have gained throughout my DNP course of study. For instance, I need to include the principles of policy development, health care economics, and data analysis to my prospectus and ensure that they are aligned with the goals of my project. Furthermore, I need to develop a comprehensive evaluation plan that highlights the key outcome measures that will be used to assess the effectiveness of my project and the criteria for evaluating the impact of the project on patient outcomes. Finally, I need to outline the steps necessary to successfully complete my DPI Project Proposal for the Institutional Review Board (IRB) in DNP-955, ensuring that I comply with all ethical and regulatory requirements for the project.

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

Describe and critique a current article that relates to Nursing Assignment Help

Describe and critique a current article that relates to hospital financing and competitive practices in healthcare. (Article should be from a scholarly, peer-reviewed journal published within the last 3-5 years). Submit 1,000-1,500-word paper with a KU title page and reference page in a scholarly format. You are a medical professor

GCU Patient Preferences in Care Discussion Reply Nursing Assignment Help

please respond to the following discussion as a peer making a comment. Hello everyone, Integrating patient preferences and values with clinician expertise is essential when making evidence-based decisions. This approach leads to patient-centered care, improves treatment adherence, and enhances health outcomes. Patients’ unique values, beliefs, priorities, and circumstances can significantly

UM Administrator in Training Rotation Experience Report Nursing Assignment Help

Complete and Submit the Three Sections of the Report for the Assignment: AIT Experience: LTC Settings and Services Report Template (ATTACHED) APA: Include APA 7th Edition Formatted Reference Page. ALL RESPONSES IN PARAGRAPH FORM. Complete Section 1 of the Report Select the Long Term Care (LTC) Settings and Services: ALREADY

NYU Autoimmune Disease of Myelin Abstract Nursing Assignment Help

`The disease is called MS You should read Wikipedia “Immune System”, “Antibody”,  “Antigen”, “T  cell”, “B cell”, “Macrophage”, “Dendritic cell”  for writing your abstract. It would also be good to read the Wikipedia article on MS.  The purpose of writing an abstract is to condense the material you have read

Within the Professions of Psychology Paper Nursing Assignment Help

PSY 540 Final Project Guidelines and Rubric Overview Within the professions of psychology, it can be typical for you to work on proposals for programs, studies, or new initiatives. For example, you may work for a university that regularly partners with foundations and corporations to identify grant opportunities for projects

Professional Ethics Instructions Baccalaureate education Nursing Assignment Help

Professional Ethics Instructions Baccalaureate education includes the development of professional values and value-based behavior (AACN, 2008). Ethics define professional ethics and their importance in the healthcare environment. The American Nurses Association has approved 13 standardized languages that support nursing care.  The benefits of standardized language include: better communication among nurses

Select one of the following populations: Aging Nursing Assignment Help

Select one of the following populations: Aging Population Homelessness Migrant Workers LGBTQIA+ Other Identified Vulnerable Populations from Your Reading Then complete the following steps for your discussion post: Identify which vulnerable population you have chosen to use for this post and describe what this vulnerable population looks like in your

WGU Population Health Data Analysis Paper Nursing Assignment Help

In this course, you learned that Informatics for Transforming Nursing Care integrates nursing science with multiple information and analytical sciences to identify, define, manage, and communicate data, information, knowledge, and wisdom in nursing practice. This provides knowledge and skills to apply informatics concepts, communications, and data critical to facilitating interprofessional

Professional EthicsInstructions Baccalaureate education Nursing Assignment Help

Professional EthicsInstructions Baccalaureate education includes the development of professional values and value-based behavior (AACN, 2008). Ethics define professional ethics and their importance in the healthcare environment. The American Nurses Association has approved 13 standardized languages that support nursing care.  The benefits of standardized language include: better communication among nurses and

HSA 599 SU Public Health Emergencies Discussion Nursing Assignment Help

I’m working on a health & medical discussion question and need the explanation and answer to help me learn. Discuss a life-threatening event or a natural disaster in your community, such as a severe weather event, terrorist attack, or other type of public health emergency. Examine an overall strategy that

Develop a literature map or a visual representation of the Nursing Assignment Help

Develop a literature map or a visual representation of the Public Health Informatics literature.  Also include a powerpoint presentation explaining the literature map with the slides Constructing a literature map helps you: develop an understanding of the key issues and research findings in the literature organize ideas see how different research studies