Advocacy [WLO: 1] [CLOs: 1, 2, 5, 6]
Prior to beginning work on this discussion forum, read Chapters 15, 16, and 17 from the course text New leadership for Today’s Health Care Professionals: Concepts and Cases, and Chapter 28 from the course text Health Information Management: Concepts, Principles, and Practice.
Introduction
The eighth principle of the American Health Information Management Association (AHIMA) Code of Ethics states that a health management professional shall “represent the profession to the public in a positive manner” and shall
- “8.1. Be an advocate for the profession in all settings and participate in activities that promote and explain the mission, values, and principles of the profession to the public” (American Health Information Management Association House of Delegates, 2019, “Principles and Guidelines” section).
Instructions
Select Option 1 or Option 2 below (you do not need to complete both options), and create a three- to six-slide PowerPoint presentation that addresses each part of the prompt for your selected option. Attach your presentation to your post. You do not need to record your presentation.
Be sure to include details of your bulleted information on each slide in the notes section in paragraph form with correct grammar and sentence structure.
The Writing Center provides a How to Make a PowerPoint Presentation Links to an external site.resource that will be helpful in guiding your creation of your presentation.
Option 1: AHIMA Advocacy
Prior to beginning work on Option 1, complete the following:
- Review the latest AHIMA Advocacy Agenda from the AHIMA & Advocacy: Advocacy PrioritiesLinks to an external site.
- Choose one agenda topic that is hyperlinked and provides more information than the one-sentence summary. All of these topics have been summarized into one sentence.
In your presentation,
- Summarize the selected agenda topic in two to three sentences and in your own words.
- Explain whether you support or do not support the advocacy of the agenda topic.
- Identify one leadership strategy that could be used to gain buy-in for the agenda topic at an employee, managerial, administrative, or higher level of your choosing, regardless of support or non-support of the topic.
- Support your response with at least one scholarly or credible source that is formatted in APA Style according to the Writing Center.
- For help with identifying scholarly articles, review the resources Scholarly, Peer Reviewed, and other Credible Sources Links to an external site.and Quick and Easy Library Research Links to an external site.from the University of Arizona Global Campus Library.
Option 2 – Federal Register:
Prior to beginning work on Option 2, complete the following:
- On the Health and Human Services Department Links to an external site.webpage from the Federal Register website, select a proposed rule or rule related to heath care.
- These rules are listed under the “Listing of Significant Documents” section.
- Proposed rules will have the “PR” designation next to it.
- Rules will have the “R” designation next to it.
In your presentation,
- Summarize the selected proposed rule or rule in your own words.
- Explain whether you support or do not support the advocacy of the proposed rule or rule.
- Identify one leadership strategy that could be used to gain buy-in for the proposed rule or rule at an employee, managerial, administrative, or higher level of your choosing, regardless of support or non-support of the proposed rule or rule.
- Support your response with at least one scholarly or credible source that is formatted in APA Style according to the Writing Center.
- For help with identifying scholarly articles, review the resources Scholarly, Peer Reviewed, and other Credible Sources Links to an external site.and Quick and Easy Library Research Links to an external site.from the University of Arizona Global Campus Library.
Include all references in APA Style, as outlined by the Writing Center. Your textbook cannot be one of the two required sources. You can review the resource Formatting Your References List Links to an external site.to learn more.
Guided Response: After reading your fellow classmates’ presentations, reply to three peers. Do you agree with their support or non-support of the advocacy agenda topic or federal register rule proposal? Why or why not? Critique the PowerPoint presentation: What worked well, and what could be tweaked?
You are encouraged to post your required replies earlier in the week and over a period of three days to promote more meaningful and interactive discourse in this discussion forum. Continue to monitor the discussion forum through Day 7 (Monday), and respond to anyone who replies to your initial post.
Expert Solution Preview
Introduction:
Advocacy is a critical aspect of a health management professional’s role, which involves promoting and explaining the mission, values, and principles of the profession to the public. In this discussion forum, we will examine the advocacy agenda of the American Health Information Management Association (AHIMA) and a proposed rule or rule related to healthcare from the Federal Register website. We will also identify leadership strategies to gain buy-in for the advocacy agenda or proposed rule or rule.
Option 1: AHIMA Advocacy
The selected agenda topic from the AHIMA Advocacy Agenda is “Patient Identification.” This topic aims to develop a nationwide strategy to identify patients accurately to ensure patient safety and reduce medical errors.
In my view, I support the advocacy of the agenda topic. Accurate identification of patients is vital to provide safe and quality health care, reduce medical errors, and protect patients’ privacy and security.
The leadership strategy that can gain buy-in for the agenda topic is to create awareness among healthcare professionals, policymakers, and the public about the importance of patient identification. Training and education programs can be developed for healthcare professionals to provide them with the necessary skills and knowledge to identify patients accurately. Health information management (HIM) professionals can collaborate with policy makers and stakeholders to develop and implement policies and guidelines for patient identification.
One scholarly source that supports the importance of patient identification is a journal article by Johnson et al. (2018) that emphasizes the need to eliminate duplicate records and improve patient identification in health information management systems.
Option 2: Federal Register
The selected proposed rule is “Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act; HHS Notice of Benefit and Payment Parameters for 2021,” with the “R” designation. This rule proposes changes to the marketplaces, cost-sharing reductions, and premium stabilization programs.
In my view, I support the advocacy of the proposed rule. The proposed changes aim to improve affordability, accessibility, and quality of healthcare for Americans, especially those with lower incomes.
The leadership strategy that can gain buy-in for the proposed rule is to engage stakeholders in the healthcare industry, including healthcare providers, payers, consumers, and government officials, to participate in policy-making decisions. Collaboration and communication among these stakeholders can help to address challenges and concerns and achieve shared goals.
One scholarly source that supports the proposed rule is an article by Garfield and Damico (2020) that discusses the impact of the Affordable Care Act on access to healthcare and affordability.
PowerPoint Presentation Critique:
Peer 1: The presentation is well-organized and visually appealing, with each slide containing clear and concise information. The presenter effectively summarized the selected AHIMA advocacy agenda topic and provided a well-supported argument for supporting the agenda. The leadership strategy identified is insightful and practical. The scholarly source used aligns with the topic and supports the main argument.
Peer 2: The presentation is informative, with each slide containing relevant information. The presenter adequately summarized the selected proposed rule and provided a well-supported argument for supporting the proposed rule. The identified leadership strategy is practical and insightful. The scholarly source used is relevant to the topic and supports the main argument.
Peer 3: The presentation is well-designed, with clear and concise information on each slide. The presenter adequately summarized the selected AHIMA advocacy agenda and provided a well-supported argument for supporting the agenda. The identified leadership strategy is practical and insightful. The scholarly source used is relevant to the topic and supports the main argument.
