It is not unusual for use to contemplate the changes we would make to healthcare policy if we were in charge. Indeed, criticism of our leaders and their actions has become a bit of a sport. In this assignment you are given the opportunity to critically reflect on changing the Affordable Care Act of 2010 and its supporting regulation. This is not a forum to repeat talking points from the various pundits. Rather, it is expected that this reflective paper would prompt broad, critical, creative thinking to resolve what may be the most important policy and legal issues of our time. This is an opportunity to be part of the solution.
Instructions
- In your textbook, Essentials of health policy and law, read Chapters 8, 10, and 11.
- Prepare a 3-4 page reflection paper, not including the title page and references. The paper should follow all APA guidelines.
- Remember a reflection paper focuses on your thoughts about the topic rather than just writing a summary or description. If you have never written a reflection paper, a short 5 minute video with some guidance can be viewed at
- For the assignment you are completing the sentence “If I were President…”; providing your reflections on needed changes and solutions to weaknesses in the Affordable Care Act (ACA) of 2010.
- Some questions to prompt your reflection are:
- Which policies and regulations from the ACA were/were not working?
- What population needs are not adequately met?
- What changes could be made to improve the legislation or meet the needs of the population?
- What would be the economic impact of your proposed changes? How will we pay for them?
- Will the changes impact the rights of individuals?
- Will the changes improve the quality of care?
- Will the changes improve the efficiency of the system?
NOTE: There is no requirement for you to answer all the above questions. Just use them to guide your thoughts and assess in critical evaluation.
Expert Solution Preview
Introduction:
The Affordable Care Act of 2010 and its supporting regulations have been the subject of much discussion and debate over the years. As medical college students, it is important to critically reflect on this policy and legal issue and come up with creative solutions to improve it. In this assignment, students are expected to consider different aspects of the ACA and provide their reflection on the necessary changes and solutions to the weaknesses of the legislation.
1. What chapters of the textbook, “Essentials of health policy and law,” should be read for this assignment?
For this assignment, students should read Chapters 8, 10, and 11 of the textbook, “Essentials of health policy and law,” to gain a comprehensive understanding of the ACA and its supporting regulations.
2. How many pages should the reflection paper be, according to the instructions?
The reflection paper should be 3-4 pages long, not including the title page and references. Students must follow all APA guidelines.
3. What is the major focus of a reflection paper, and where can students find guidance if they have never written one?
A reflection paper focuses on the writer’s thoughts about the topic rather than just summarizing or describing it. Students who have never written a reflection paper can find guidance in a short 5-minute video available at the link provided in the instructions.
4. What sentence should students complete in their reflection paper, according to the instructions?
In their reflection paper, students should complete the sentence “If I were President…”, providing their reflections on needed changes and solutions to weaknesses in the Affordable Care Act (ACA) of 2010.
5. What questions can students use to guide their reflection and critical evaluation of the ACA in their paper?
To guide their reflection and critical evaluation, students can use the following questions: Which policies and regulations from the ACA were/were not working? What population needs are not adequately met? What changes could be made to improve the legislation or meet the needs of the population? What would be the economic impact of their proposed changes? How will we pay for them? Will the changes impact the rights of individuals? Will the changes improve the quality of care? Will the changes improve the efficiency of the system? However, there is no requirement for students to answer all these questions, but they can use them to guide their thoughts and critical assessment.