Instructions are attached  supporting doc attached Presenter’s Name:Lila Davis

Instructions are attached 

supporting doc attached 

Presenter’s Name:

Lila Davis

Person Providing Critique:

Brianna Davis

Component

Comments

Case summary:

Case was summarized in a succinct, easy-to-understand manner and was in the presenter’s own words. I understood the issue confronting the Supreme Court.

APA’s brief:

The APA’s stance was presented in an easy-to-understand manner. The presenter discussed relevant research included in the brief. It was clear how the APA was trying to contribute to the case.

Opinion:

I understood the outcome of the case and the presenter made clear how this did/did not coincide with the APA’s goals in their brief.

Overall:

This lecture was thorough, clear, interesting, and I learned something. The format was uncluttered and the length was appropriate. APA referencing was used properly and grammar/spelling was correct.

Directions: View the assigned PowerPoint presentations and fill out the form – one per each student’s presentation you are critiquing. For each component, write your comments. Write as much or as little as you feel necessary; the comments table should expand as you write. Remember, your critique will be graded as well – 25 points per critique.
Due by Sunday at 11:59 P.M. ET.

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

 What are the main hypotheses? What is/are independent variable(s)? What is/are dependent variable(s)? How did researchers recruit their participants?

  What are the main hypotheses? What is/are independent variable(s)? What is/are dependent variable(s)? How did researchers recruit their participants? Identify participants’ demographic information and data collection procedure. What materials did researchers utilize to measure the hypotheses? Identify the apparatus and measurements. What are the key findings/results of the study?