Topic 2: Case Study
Look at the case study number one, (In)Secure Communication? on page 240 of Health Policy and Politics, A Nurses Guide, by Milstead. Analyze what might have transpired if Annie did not have a nursing background. List the breakdowns in communication that occurred and the potential ramifications. Did the advance practice nurse’s office fulfill a meaningful use stage 2 requirements of providing secure electronic communication between the patient and healthcare provider? Why or why not?
At least 250 words with 2 references/citations
Expert Solution Preview
Introduction:
The case study, “(In)Secure Communication?” in Milstead’s book Health Policy and Politics, A Nurses Guide, discusses the importance of secure communication between healthcare providers and patients. The scenario explained in the book highlights the potential breakdowns in communication that may occur during interactions between healthcare providers and patients. In this assignment, we will analyze what might have happened if Annie did not have a nursing background, list the breakdowns in communication that occurred in the case study, and evaluate whether the advance practice nurse’s office fulfilled a meaningful use stage 2 requirements of providing secure electronic communication.
Answer:
If Annie did not have a nursing background, she might not have been able to comprehend the importance of secure communication between the healthcare provider and the patient. She might have ignored the significance of the nurse’s instruction to follow the steps to ensure secure communication. As a result, she would not have been able to send her test results via a secure electronic means, leading to the potential of her personal medical information being exposed to unauthorized individuals.
Several breakdowns in communication occurred in the case study, including the nurse’s failure to provide clear instructions about secure communication and the lack of Annie’s understanding of the significance of secure communication. This resulted in Annie being unsure about how to send her test results. Additionally, when Annie did send her test results, there was no assurance that the communication occurred securely.
The advance practice nurse’s office did not fulfill a meaningful use stage 2 requirements of providing secure electronic communication because there was no clear instruction about secure communication given to the patient. Furthermore, the nurse allowed the patient to send her test results through an insecure means when the patient was unsure about how to send the results securely.
Conclusion:
The breakdowns in communication that occurred in the case study could have been avoided with better communication between the healthcare provider and the patient. The scenarios discussed in the book highlight the importance of clear communication and secure electronic communication between healthcare providers and patients. The advance practice nurse’s office should ensure that patients receive clear instructions about secure electronic communication to protect the privacy of their medical information.
