2 questions 250 words each. 2 references each
1. The “Revised Standards for Quality Improvement Reporting Excellence: SQUIRE 2.0″ guidelines, located in the topic Resources, provide some guidance on the evaluation of quality improvement efforts. They are used as both grant proposal and manuscript publication preparation guidelines. Discuss how your project aligns with the SQUIRE 2.0 guidelines. Explain why your DPI Project is a quality improvement project and not a research project
2. Select a nursing journal in which you would be interested in having your completed DPI Project published. Identify the journal and include a summary of the author guidelines. Describe at least two other methods commonly used by authors to disseminate or report quality improvement outcomes. How could the author guidelines, or those additional strategies you identified, be beneficial to you as you develop and implement your DPI Project? How could the author guidelines be beneficial to your practice? (Use AANP)
Expert Solution Preview
Introduction:
As a medical professor, it is important to understand the guidelines and standards that govern the evaluation of quality improvement efforts in the healthcare sector. In this assignment, we will discuss the alignment of a quality improvement project with the SQUIRE 2.0 guidelines and distinguish it from a research project. Additionally, we will explore the author guidelines of a nursing journal for publishing quality improvement outcomes and examine other methods commonly used by authors to disseminate such outcomes.
Question 1:
The SQUIRE 2.0 guidelines provide a framework for evaluating and reporting quality improvement efforts that can be used in grant proposals and manuscript publications. My DPI project aligns with the SQUIRE 2.0 guidelines as it focuses on enhancing the medication adherence of patients with diabetes through the implementation of medication reminders. The project aims to improve patient outcomes by reducing the number of medication-related hospitalizations and emergency room visits. Furthermore, this project involves collaboration with patients, clinicians, and healthcare organizations to address the challenges of medication adherence through quality improvement efforts. The SQUIRE 2.0 guidelines advocate for the involvement of stakeholders in the improvement process to ensure that the approach is patient-centered.
My DPI project is a quality improvement project because it is aimed at improving clinical outcomes in a specific population in a clinical setting. It uses existing data to understand the current state of medication adherence and evaluates the effectiveness of the intervention strategy in improving outcomes. In contrast, a research project generates new knowledge and data to address gaps in clinical practices and uses experimental designs to assess the effectiveness of the intervention strategy.
References:
1. Davidoff F, Batalden P, Stevens D, et al. Development of the SQUIRE Publication Guidelines: evolution of the SQUIRE project. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2008;34(11):681-687. doi:10.1016/s1553-7250(08)34088-1
2. Shojania KG, Grimshaw JM. Evidence-based quality improvement: the state of the science. Health Aff (Millwood). 2005;24(1):138-150. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.24.1.138
Question 2:
AANP’s Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners is a relevant nursing journal that covers topics related to advanced nursing practice, research, and quality improvement. The author guidelines of AANP’s Journal require that quality improvement projects’ authors follow the SQUIRE 2.0 guidelines or other quality improvement frameworks when reporting their outcomes. Additionally, the scope of the journal includes clinical practice, education, public policy, and other areas relevant to nurse practitioners.
Two other commonly used methods to disseminate quality improvement outcomes are presentations and posters at conferences and web-based dissemination platforms. Presenting quality improvement outcomes at conferences enhances networking opportunities, provides feedback on the quality of the project, and promotes learning and dissemination of innovative practices. Web-based dissemination platforms such as the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality’s (AHRQ) Health Care Innovations Exchange provide an opportunity to share insights, lessons learned, and outcomes of the project with a broader audience.
The author guidelines of AANP’s Journal and other dissemination methods such as conference and web-based platforms will be beneficial to me in developing and implementing my DPI Project by providing guidance on reporting quality improvement outcomes and expanding the project’s reach to a broader audience. The author guidelines will also provide a platform for publishing and promoting the project’s outcomes and possibly attract funding opportunities for future quality improvement initiatives. Additionally, disseminating the outcomes of the DPI Project through conferences and web-based platforms will promote the exchange of ideas and best practices with other healthcare professionals and organizations.
References:
1. Taylor R, Halm MA, Born D, et al. Patient and Family Engagement in the Design, Roll-Out, and Evaluation of a Care Transitions Program. J Nurs Care Qual. 2018;33(1):37-45. doi:10.1097/NCQ.0000000000000251
2. Samuels-Kalow ME, Coit J, Koziel JR, et al. Patient and provider perspectives on the design and implementation of an electronic consultation system for kidney care delivery in primary care. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020;20(1):359. doi:10.1186/s12913-020-05242-3
